3. That Kingston box junction
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: That Kingston box junction  (Read 38016 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #30 on: »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #31 on: »
Review hearing: 2250674379. 22nd July at 12.30 hrs. Not to be missed. The YBJ Guru is on board too.

You can phone the tribunal for the link or ask me.

A crescendo is taking place.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2026, 11:38:07 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #32 on: »
Review successful: 2250674379  ;D  Decision tomorrow. For the avoidance of doubt, for which RBK are wholly responsible: this concerns the junction with Elm Road. Not the other one with Westbury Road.  8)

The Head of Highways (Matthew Hill) and the author of the Consultancy Report (Keith Firth) did not attend even though I requested them to do so. Not even a response.

Taking next week off to compose the JR application.  This is yet another PCN which should not have been issued. I have researched every allowed decisions from 1st January 2024 to the present day and the results are staggering.

Needless to say, the refused decisions would have had a different result with proper representations with help from us. Perhaps.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2026, 11:55:40 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #33 on: »
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #34 on: »
Quote
The point made in the written submission about the TSRGD providing the basis for this restriction-type is not correct as the restriction is provided for in the Highway Code.

What. The. Actual. Feck?!?!?!
Logged
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #35 on: »
A good result after all that time. Well done.
Logged
Bus driving since 1973. My advice, if you have a PSV licence, destroy it when you get to 65 or you'll be forever in demand.
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #36 on: »
Quote from: roythebus on July 25, 2026, 01:40:19 pm
A good result after all that time. Well done.

27 minutes of torture - not for me.  :-X
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #37 on: »
I attended as an Observer. First class, very well conducted review and very welcome outcome.
Logged
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #38 on: »
Quote from: andy_foster on July 25, 2026, 01:33:59 pm
Quote
The point made in the written submission about the TSRGD providing the basis for this restriction-type is not correct as the restriction is provided for in the Highway Code.

What. The. Actual. Feck?!?!?!

Not quite the language I used.  :-X
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #39 on: »
Many of the procedural nuances in decriminalised enforcement are above my pay grade. That one was closer to "I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain it to you.". Or, to quote Mr Mackey, "Drugs are bad, m'kay?"
Logged
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #40 on: »
Quote from: andy_foster on July 25, 2026, 01:33:59 pm
Quote
The point made in the written submission about the TSRGD providing the basis for this restriction-type is not correct as the restriction is provided for in the Highway Code.

What. The. Actual. Feck?!?!?!
Is this another adjudicator that is also "wet behind the ears"?  Surely, by applying the test(s) of what constitutes a YJB contravention, he should have reached the same and very straightforward conclusion that was arrived at in the review.
Logged
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #41 on: »
On a more positive note, a refund has already been made.
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #42 on: »
And I hasten to add that I received a most beautiful and uplifting e mail of thanks from the appellant.

Rasmalai to follow! Yum yum. Reminds me of my university days. The Akash Restaurant, Rusholme. 1970 to 1974 at least.

And many thanks to the Yellow Box Guru.

The Akashic Record keeps every thought and action.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2026, 12:32:55 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
  3. That Kingston box junction