Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Work is 30 miles away. It's a special needs residential school where i am a senior care workerThen you would need to major on the impact on others.
The log records who has the car on a daily basis not per hour or minuteThen the log records who is the person keeping the vehicle?
Any help is greatly appreciated.Not a lot to say until a NIP/s172 arrives.
Did you hold the phone at any point whilst also using it and driving? And perhaps more importantly, if you put the prosecution to proof, could they prove that you did?Cycling Mikey will have a video recording and, as noted, isn't shy in attending court.
You say :I therefore did pay up", surely that means you can't plead not guilty in court. You've already dealt with the matter as a 6 point FPN.No as one of the conditions of accepting the CoFP (Not FPN) is not reaching or exceeding 12 points.
All valid points and I will take this away and get to the bottom of the question of "who is the registered keeper". Thanks for all your responses.Just to clarify that the requirement to name the driver (s172) is valid and must be responded to within the 28 days. The '14 day rule' does not change that requirement.
...was just seeing if there was a quick resolution.Absent any actual defence (nothing you've said so far hints at one) then the quickest resolution will be a course to avoid the points or a fixed penalty (3 points £100).
I have now had an SJP notice. Among the forest of paperwork they have sent with the SJP is a Statement of Facts which states that I drove my vehicle on the “ Towards ( let’s say ) Banbury bound carriageway of the M40”. The offence was actually on the away from Banbury bound carriageway. One of the EROS offence images has been annotated with M40 SB which I assume means Southbound and that is correct.They may have been on the SB carriageway but can enforce in both directions. The key part was your car was there.
The wording on the charge sheet mentions my vehicle on the M40 but doesn’t state which carriageway I was on.
The back of another piece of paper has a signature from plod 1 saying the SD card was copied to disc on the 15th Dec ( correct ) which has been overwritten and initialled with 16th Dec ( incorrect ).It's normal for the session video to be processed the day after by the backoffice.
Or will a single JP say there is so much doubt and throw the prosecution’s case out ?A single JP won't decide anything unless you plead guilty. And there's still a chance they'll refer the matter to a normal court hearing to consider a ban.
I would not have thought they would send out a reminder so soon.It's dated 26 days after the offence (Almost 4 weeks) - may be, may be not a 'reminder'...
I have heard that some police forces do not offer courses for speeding when the vehicle involved is an HGV.On another scan I think you may be right - the streetlighting is only on one side and very easy to miss.