Free Traffic Legal Advice

Yes, I can imagine. Having lived not far from a neighborhood predominantly populated by gypsies, I know they are usually proud, independent people, who don't take kindly to intimidation. Bailiffs would not be able to scare them. But that would be a totally different can of worms in itself, that I would rather leave unopened.
In my case, we are talking about a 15 yo minor alone on the premises. While a pending N244 was in the Court. Hardly any reasons for using unreasonable force like breaking doors down to smithereens'. I am still searching for the exact link to the bit of legislation that says something about agents not being allowed to proceed when that is the case. I'm sure I will soon find it, just need some more time. 

Not suggesting anything. Just answering to cp8759 

He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know.

Lao Tzu

If you drip-feed things and omit key information it's hard for anyone to be specific!

Do bear in mid not everything is enshrined in law and indeed the law seldom says what one CAN do and most often prescribes what one CANNOT.

I didn't realize I was drip-feeding information, I was just presented things as they were unfolding. If it appeared so, it wasn't my intention.
I get what you are saying about the law and my intention is to find out exactly what the person named on the writ cannot/is not supposed to be doing, before he actually comes and does his deed. Preempting is always better than remedying, just as prevention is always better than a cure.

Hi Southpaw. So far, no one has produced enough evidence to substantiate the fact that indeed a HCEO can use force, or to what extent that force can be used. I rather go by what the law says, instead of relying on hearsay.

In my research thus far I did not come across anything to specifically say that, hence my express requests that people contribute with actual links to legislation.

Not to mention that the crux of the matter remains: the Appointed Person on the Notice of eviction should also be the same as the HCEO that will attend the property. The name I was given came up empty, again and again. I can't confirm that he is who he says he is. Would you trust that person coming to your door? I am still amazed that nobody is concerned about that being so.

Today, the so called HCEO replied to my email. Took him a while and he probably had to dig deep and consult someone is their legal department. However, the information he gave me and the links to legislation are not only irrelevant to the case, dealing with collections of fines or inapplicable situation, but the main piece of evidence he relies upon has actually strengthened my case against the use of force. He sent me to look up a precedent dated 1604, Semayne's case, where I came across this brilliant definition of it, by Sir Edward Cooke:

https://www.dealingwithbailiffs.co.uk/Semayne-v-Gresham1604.htm

'The Semayne case is the origin of the modern phrase: A mans house is his castle and this is borne out of Sir Edward Coke's commentary - The house of everyone is to him is his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose and if thieves come to a man's house to rob or murder, and the owner or his servants kill any of the thieves in defence of himself and his house, it is no felony and he shall lose nothing. This sets the common law rule that forced entry by a bailiff cannot be made into private homes.'

Hi again. Sorry about not replying earlier, I was pretty busy dealing with things. Thank you for the input and concern.

I have submitted the N244 today, 31.10.2023, explaining to the judge that the notice has arrived whilst we were away and we need a few more days to return and deal with it in person. I explained that my wife is suffering from and has been diagnosed with clinical mental depression and anxiety and can't deal with things without my supervision. I would have returned on my own, but she can't cope with things on her own, let alone dealing with 2 elderly relatives, hospital visits 60km away to the capital, etc.

I have researched the law online and according to gov.uk, bailiffs cannot force entry to a private property, nor are they allowed to enter when only a minor under 16 is present:

https://www.gov.uk/your-rights-bailiffs

I also emailed the person who is supposed to come, namely Jonathan Chatfield, asking him kindly to consider postponing the visit until we return to London, on the 11.11.2023. He replied saying that the reference sent to him does not apply to high court enforcement officers, only to bailiffs. Yet the reference does not make a distinction between bailiffs, only between county court and high court officers, calling them both 'bailiffs'. And is is quite specific about neither being allowed to force entry, unless we are talking about squatters or commercial premises, criminal fines or HMRC taxes. And even those as a last resort. None of those apply in our case.

What's even more concerning, a search for Jonathan Chatfield on High Court Enforcement Officers Association (HCEOA) came up empty. The guy claims to be an HCEO, yet he is not registered with them? An impersonator, a fraud? Digging a bit deeper and found him here: Marston (Holdings) Limited. Jon headed the London office until October 2020. He then went Equivo LTD, where he is now managing director of the enforcement division. He claims both on Linkedin and Equivo that he is a student member of the HCEO's association. Again, he is not on their database.

I emailed him back, asking him to tell me where exactly I can find evidence for his claim: 'We must point out though that the article you quoted relates to bailiffs who are collecting civil debts and not when enforcing a High Court Writ of Possession.  As High Court Enforcement Officers we may force an entry and have any occupiers removed.'

His statement is both incriminating and problematic for him, as he seems to have tried to intimidate us by misrepresentation of his powers as a HCEO. While he is not even one!?

According to my research and the UK Law, nobody is allowed to enter a premise where a minor under 16 is living. Be they who they may. NOBODY. I would like to see him try, as I have instructed 2 friends to position themselves in front of the property and take video evidence of the proceedings. I also instructed my son to lock the door and not open to anyone, under any circumstances, as advised by a lawyer. He is a strong lad and I would pity anyone trying to break in and try to touch him, as in forcible entry and removal. I hope it won't come down to self defense, we are in the UK aftercall. At the first sign of forced entry, he is to call 999 immediately, while recording the whole time.

Another site that backs my research: https://www.realbusinessrescue.co.uk/company-insolvency/what-is-a-high-court-enforcement-officer-and-what-rights-do-they-have

What rights do High Court Enforcement Officers have?
Although HCEOs cannot force entry into your home unless you have granted access on a previous occasion, they do have right of entry to your business premises as long as there is no residential element to the building.

You should receive prior warning of an HCEO visit, and they must ensure the premises are properly secured before they leave. High Court Enforcement Officers operate under strict legislation, however, and the national standards for Taking Control of Goods state,

“Enforcement agents must not be deceitful by misrepresenting their powers, qualifications, capacities, experience or abilities …”

This is an important point when enforcement action is being taken. You also need to know your own rights in the situation, and it’s helpful to obtain professional advice in this respect. So which goods and possessions can be taken from your business premises by High Court Enforcement Officers under the Taking Control of Goods Regulations, 2013?

As I have said, I have emailed Jonathan Chatfield and asked the so called HCEO that does not appear to be one to tell me what kind of force is he planning to use when reaching the house. Also, what plan he has in mind when it comes to making good on his 'we will remove anyone living there'. I am eagerly waiting for his reply and will let you know what he has to say.

Hello everyone. I have received a 2 weeks notice of eviction from the court, specifying a time and date when the bailiff will come around with a representative of the landlord: 03.112023 at 10AM. The property should be vacated by that point, it says.  The problem I have is that I am away in Europe with my wife, attending to some her mom's health problems. In the property at the moment are our 2 children, 15 yo son and 18 yo daughter. Our return flight is on the 13th of Nov and it seems that my only option is to fill in a N244 and ask the court for a postponement. Has anyone been confronted with a similar situation(very unlikely) or has any helpful advice in the matter? Any help would be much appreciated.

Hello everyone. I was advised to migrate here from the Pepipoo site, so here I am. Original thread link:

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=149343

Cp8759 has been kind enough to help me fight this and his support is much appreciated. In short, I was given a camera operator ticket while I stopped and parked the car on the pavement, in front of a store, to get some building supplies on my way to work. The pavement was very wide at that location(roughly about twice the normal width) and I was not obstructing the passage for anyone. I kept an eye out for any unwelcome traffic wardens passing by, but the eagle eye of the camera operator 120 spotted me and zoomed in, to take the reg plate number.
However, the operator must have been too eager to send me the ticket and forgot that it was a Saturday. TfL does not mail out tickets on a Saturday, as it was confirmed in the reply to the FOI sent to them by cp8759. Mail is only picked up Monday to Friday. So by their admission, he committed a procedural impropriety according to this:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/3483/schedule/made

'Paragraph 3 of Schedule 2 to The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices, Charging Guidelines and General Provisions) (England) Regulations 2022 provides that:


 'Contents of a regulation 10 penalty charge notice
2. A regulation 10 penalty charge notice, in addition to the matters required to be included in it by regulation 3(4) of the Representations and Appeals Regulations, must state—
(a)the date of the notice, which must be the date on which it is posted'

The notice was issued with Saturday's date on it, while being posted out the on Monday, thus going against the regulations and invalidating the PCN. I think this can mainly help out all of the people that are being issued tickets over the weekend periods, Sat and Sun more specifically.