Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - matriarchrising

Pages: [1]
1
...but especially being on 9 points and reliant on my licence to ensure my husband who has 0 points took them, as I say on offence definitely was and the other also of they were his.

Just to be clear - you are being prosecuted and not your husband.  (There's no formal process now to 'pass' the prosecution/points to him even if you can prove he was driving)

I'm aware you saying that this adds weight to the claim that the NIPs did not arrive.

Ah yes, ok thanks. I mean I would have done this orginally if I had been afforded the opprunity of them actually sending it to me, so I think it is worth mentioned in the covering letter/my evidence section and in court if it came to it?

2
Thanks, that’s really helpful and I appreciate you taking the time to explain it.

If I was sitting on something like 0–6 points and not already on 9, I’d probably just take the pragmatic route and admit the September speeding (as it genuinely could have been me) and deal with that, while defending the January one as I know that wasn’t me driving.

But because I’m already on 9 points it sounds like it woould onnly end back in court anyway... So from what you’re saying, the only real route to avoiding that is to plead not guilty to the FtP charges and defend them on the basis that the notices were never received.

As I said after years of never having any problems and odd 35 in a 30 offences... at the same address with same vehicles, that the exact same situation happened to my husband last year — he received an SJP out of the blue having never received the original NIP or driver request. He pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the Section 172, and then a couple of months later we just received a letter saying the case had been dismissed. He never had to attend court or do anything further.

That obviously makes me wonder whether something similar could happen again,if they know there is an issue with West Yorkshire Police producing evidence... although I realise that may just have been luck or administrative issue.

Given my points situation it sounds like the sensible approach is probably to plead not guilty to everything and be prepared to defend the FtP charges in court if necessary.

Out of interest, would you bother mentioning the previous case involving my husband, or is that likely to be irrelevant/irritating/stoking in the eyes of the court?

3
Thanks. No copies of the original NIPs or any pictures or evidence included in the SJP Pack.

I am 100% I definitely wasn't driving on one of them. And genuinely unsure of the other as although its registered in my name it is a family used vehicle.

I don't get how/why a bench would think that/be skeptical? Maybe I'm new to this, but why would someone not respond? Surely eventually catches up?

I would have absolutely dealt with, as I always would these things, but especially being on 9 points and reliant on my licence to ensure my husband who has 0 points took them, as I say on offence definitely was and the other also of they were his.

To confirm again, vehicle has been owned for 5 years. We have not moved/changed address etc.

We have in the lasty 1/2 years ago received NIP correspondence and dealt with it absolutely fine.


4
Thanks, all is definitely in order here. V5 been in the cupboard, nothing changed, not moved house, owned this same vehicle since Sept 2021 as V5 notes. Its not just 2 NIP's not received we didn't receive one for my husband last year also. I've heard a similar situation from my friend that owns a garage locally after telling him. All other post absolutely fine. I received a different NIP early year before last and another the year before that that which I of course dealt with and responded to promptly. (all within the same ownership of the same vehicle)

Any advice on how to plead and deal with welcomed. Thank you.

5
I'm trying to find my V5 docs now, but I have owned the car since 2021. Here is a image, they are saying in the section that says 'statement of evidence':

A combined Notice of Intended Prosecution/request under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 was served on the defendant within 14 days, requiring them to furnish details of the driver at the time of the alleged offence, the defendant being the registered keeper / insured party of the involved vehicle. This combined notice was sent on 18/09/2025 and by the 20/10/2025 they had not replied as required by the legislation to that request.

(Nothing received)

an

A combined Notice of Intended Prosecution/request under Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 was served on the defendant within 14 days, requiring them to furnish details of the driver at the time of the alleged offence, the defendant being the registered keeper / insured party of the involved vehicle. This combined notice was sent on 06/01/2026 and by the 05/02/2026 they had not replied as required by the legislation to that request.

(Nothing received)

6
Hello,

I would really appreciate some advice regarding a Single Justice Procedure Notice I have recently received.

I am the registered keeper of the vehicle and my V5C address has always been correct and unchanged.

The SJP notice arrived on 24 February 2026 and requires a response by 17 March. This was the first correspondence I have received about any of the alleged offences.

The notice relates to two separate alleged speeding incidents investigated by West Yorkshire Police. For each incident there are two charges:

• Speeding
• Failure to identify the driver (Section 172)

I did not receive any earlier correspondence relating to either incident. I never received the original Notice of Intended Prosecution or the request to identify the driver, so I never had the opportunity to respond.

Incident 1 – September 2025
This relates to an alleged speed of 36mph in a 30mph limit.

This offence could potentially have been me driving, but it also could have been my husband. We have both tried to think back and check our paper diary but we genuinely cannot remember who was driving that day. We both regularly drive that route as it leads to a friend’s house that our children visit frequently, so either of us could realistically have been using the car.

The alleged offence is now nearly six months ago which makes it difficult to recall the specific journey.

I do know that the road in question has yellow box fixed speed cameras. It is a hilly road where vehicles naturally pick up speed on the descent, so it is somewhere I am usually conscious of slowing and braking near the bottom because I know the cameras are there.

Incident 2 – January 2026
This relates to an alleged speed of 35mph in a 30mph limit.

In this case I am confident that I was not the driver. I have text messages from that day showing that I was at home messaging my husband while he was out with our son doing back-to-school / holiday preparation shopping. I was sending instructions from home while he was out with the car, so based on the timing of those messages I am confident he was the one using the vehicle.

Another point which makes this situation more confusing is that something very similar happened to my husband last year. He received a Single Justice Procedure Notice months after an alleged speeding offence without ever receiving the earlier Notice of Intended Prosecution or driver identification request.

In that case he pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the Section 172 charge by post. A couple of months later we received a short letter saying the case had been dismissed. He never had to attend court, pay anything or receive any points.

Because of that experience, I am sure that the original notices may not have been successfully sent/delivered. Though we get all our normal post and have previously recieved things absolutely fine.

Another important factor is that I currently already have 9 points on my licence, so this situation is a bit more concerning to me. Because of that I have been particularly careful with my driving.

I have never previously failed to respond to official correspondence and have always complied with any requests from authorities. I rely heavily on my driving licence as we live outside practical public transport links and I have four children whose school and childcare arrangements require driving.

For that reason it simply makes no sense that I would deliberately ignore a legal notice requesting driver information.

My current understanding is that I may be able to plead not guilty to the Section 172 charges on the basis that the notices were never received. However I am unsure what the best strategy is regarding the speeding allegations given that:

• the September driver could have been either myself or my husband
• the January driver was definitely not me
• I never received the original notices requesting driver identification
I have therefore also never seen proof or evidence or the offences. Putting my car there or if its more details (my husband got photographed a few years back now by a van and you could clearly see it was him, a man in the car not me, that's how we knew)

If it ultimately came to it and points were imposed taking me over the totting threshold, which I know is a separate thing, and I think I would attend court and present an exceptional hardship argument as losing my licence would have a significant impact on my family. And I know friends who have managed to do this.  However my aim at this stage is simply to understand the best legal approach and whether there is any way this matter could potentially be dismissed given that the first correspondence received was the SJP itself. Especially after similar with my husband last year.

I would be very grateful for any advice on the best way to proceed.

Pages: [1]