3. Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - shayshay175

Pages: [1]
1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: LB Havering PCN
« on: February 05, 2026, 07:09:11 pm »
Thank you for replying. I shall do a formal appeal to the PCN due to, as you say, the mess Havering have made of this. I'll try and keep it as brief as possible.

2
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / LB Havering PCN
« on: February 05, 2026, 03:29:37 pm »
Hi
I need some advice, I do not dispute the PCN, however I do dispute how Havering handled the PCN and I do not know whether to fight it or not. The reason why I am hesitating is because Havering have this habit of wanting to go all the way and I am not sure if the TMA 2004, is even on my side and I do not know if I can even cite procedural impropriety.
    The order of how things went is like this...
    • I received a PCN on 28/11/2023, for 624, wheels on footpath.
    • Original PCN got lost.
    • NTO not received but I did get a Charge Certificate on 08/02/2024.
    • Order of Recovery was received in September 2024, where I completed a TE9 and emailed it on 05/09/2024.
    • TEC wrote to me and cancelled the Order of Recovery, letter dated 13/09/2024.
    • Another charge certificate was sent, dated 28/10/2024 and the order of recovery was received in June 2025, at my new address. Royal Mail redirection was in place.
    • TE9 sent and emailed again, 14/06/2025, mistakenly under my married surname not my maiden one but correct address. No response from TEC received.
    • Notice of enforcement was sent to my NEW address, dated 11/10/2025.
    • TE7 and TE9 sent again, 13/10/2025, with a response dated 20/01/2026
    • Notice to Owner, finally received on 04/02/2026
I have attached all correspondence received. This feels like such a breach of process. Plus both charge certificates have the date of the contravention and the date of NTO being sent as the same.
I was disputing another ticket with Havering at the same time as this one. The appeal was allowed at London Tribuanals because they replied so late to my formal appeal. I received every correspondence related to that ticket. So I do not understand how Havering messed up more than once.
Thank you
LB Havering correspondence

Pages: [1]