I appealed their rejection, and once again they failed to address my points relating to Regulation 5(2) and Merton's own Parking Enforcement Policy.
My representation:
Representation
I make formal representations against this PCN on the grounds that the contravention did not occur and that there has been a procedural impropriety.
1. The PCN was issued contrary to Regulation 5(2): statutory 10-minute grace period
I parked lawfully in a marked, designated parking bay on Worple Road at approximately 07:30. The PCN records the contravention time as 28/10/2025 at 08:31:23. The PCN was therefore issued within 10 minutes of the point at which the bay became restricted at 08:30.
Regulation 5 of The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices, Charging Guidelines and General Provisions) (England) Regulations 2022 provides:
5.—(2) No penalty charge may be imposed in relation to a parking contravention where—
(a) the vehicle is stationary in a designated parking place and is left beyond the permitted parking period; and
(b) the period for which it is left beyond the permitted parking period does not exceed 10 minutes.
My vehicle was stationary in a designated parking place and was left beyond the permitted period for less than 10 minutes. Regulation 5(2) therefore expressly prohibits the imposition of a penalty charge. In law, the contravention did not occur.
2. The council’s informal rejection misunderstands the legal issue
In rejecting my informal challenge, the council focused on the presence of yellow lines, kerb markings and signage, asserting that the PCN “can be issued immediately”.
That response does not address the legal point raised.
The issue is not whether restrictions exist, but whether a penalty charge may lawfully be imposed within the statutory 10-minute grace period when a vehicle is parked in a designated parking place.
Regulation 5(2) applies despite the existence of restrictions where the vehicle is in a designated parking place. The council’s assertion that signage allows immediate enforcement is therefore incorrect in law.
3. Failure to follow Merton’s own Enforcement Policy (procedural impropriety)
Merton Council’s Parking Enforcement Policy (July 2025) confirms the statutory position. Page 11 states:
“If a vehicle is parked legally on a designated parking bay when it is initially parked, we will apply a 10 minute grace period before issuing a PCN from the moment it becomes parked illegally.”
The policy further states:
“A 10 minute grace period will not apply to a vehicle parked outside the hours of control on a single yellow line (and not in a designated parking place) when controls commence.”
This exclusion does not apply in this case. My vehicle was parked in a clearly marked, designated parking bay (a designated parking place), as shown in the CEO photographs. It was therefore not parked on a single yellow line “and not in a designated parking place”.
By issuing the PCN within the 10-minute grace period, the council acted contrary to its own published policy. A failure to follow a published enforcement policy constitutes a procedural impropriety.
4. Conclusion
The PCN was issued within the statutory 10-minute grace period applicable to designated parking places, contrary to Regulation 5(2) of the 2022 Regulations and contrary to the council’s own Enforcement Policy.
Accordingly:
* the contravention did not occur; and
* the PCN was issued following a procedural impropriety.
The PCN must therefore be cancelled.
If the council does not agree, please provide:
* the CEO’s contemporaneous notes and observation records; and
* the Traffic Regulation Order or signed map schedule confirming the legal status of the bay and the operative times of the restrictions relied upon.
Their rejection:
Thank you for writing to us.
I have investigated the circumstances raised in your correspondence and have made the
decision to not cancel your notice. The reasons for my decision are outlined below, along
with the options available to you at this stage.
The Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) was issued to you because your vehicle was seen
stopped in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading is not permitted during
prescribed hours. At the location, there are yellow stripes on the kerb and white 'No loading'
signs. The kerb stripes mean you are not allowed to park; even to load or unload. A double
kerb stripe means the rule applies 24 hours a day, and a single kerb stripe means the rule
applies some of the time (the sign shows the times).
You have stated that you parked and, therefore, felt it was permitted for you to park.
I would point out to you that the ‘no loading’ and ‘no waiting’ signs give the same hours of
restriction. Both of these signs can be found in the Highway Code, and their meaning and
relevance should be learned whilst motorists are learning to drive. They can be found at the
location clearly stating that no waiting or loading is permitted during the restricted hours,
which are from Monday to Saturday, 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM. The sign referring to the pay and
display regulations gives the hours during which a pay and display ticket must be purchased.
However, at the location where you parked, there is a clear sign that explains that parking is
only allowed from Monday to Saturday, between the times of 9:30 AM to 6:30 PM and on
Sunday from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
Furthermore, our record shows that your vehicle was observed when "no loading" and "no
waiting" restrictions were in place; therefore, your vehicle was parked in contravention of the
rules.
Whilst I note your comment, I must advise that there is no observation time required for this
contravention. If you park where you are not allowed to, CEOs can give PCNs straight away;
they do not have to wait. Drivers do not have the right to park for just a few minutes. Where
loading or unloading is allowed, CEOs check for any loading or unloading before giving
PCNs.
Please note that it remains the motorist`s responsibility to adhere to the Highway Code, as
well as any signs and lines that may be present, to ensure that their vehicle is parked legally
before leaving it unattended.
So, whilst I note that it was not your intention to park in contravention of the restrictions that
are in force, I am satisfied that the notice has been correctly issued and that there are no
grounds on which to cancel the charge.
My point was all to do with the grace period requirement, but they only seem to mention observation time, which, from my limited understanding, is a completely different thing.
I would like to appeal this rejection, but unsure about the next steps, so any advice would be greatly appreciated.