1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Greenwich Parking on a supposedly double yellow line - Crumpsall Street (junction with Abbey Wood Road)
« on: October 03, 2025, 09:25:07 am »
Hi Incandescent.
My only defense is that I am resident of 10 years and I have held the long term belief that this has always been a single yellow line as is the convention on the streets surrounding me. I.e I didn't arrive out of the blue one day and find a road that looked on the surface like a double yellow and chance it. In my situation I moved to a street 10 years ago that was marked like this and believed that the old line had been covered up and relined as a single yellow still. I've probably parked in this exact spot maybe 2 or 3 times a week for the last 10 years and never once questioned that it was a single line.

Do you not think the Google Street view photo history that I shared in my first post would support the argument that I as a resident believed I was parked on a single line and would an argument be likely to win an appeal?
I can see from the photos that the enforcement officer took that in isolation it may look like a car parked on a double yellow but when you look at the line without a car parked over it is there any argument that it wouldn't be clear to a reasonable driver if it was actually a double yellow or a single yellow that had been poorly maintained?

Having examined it quite closely now I think that it was a single line originally lined wide from the kerb to avoid the grate and then covered over and relined at a 'normal' distance to the kerb. The two line vary in width from each other as well so it's not like a freshly marked perfectly parallel line. To me this is a confusing marking of it was indeed intentionally lined this way to be a double. I'm not sure if you or anyone else knows if there are prescribed widths/distances for double yellows or a standardised way to note a transition from single to yellow? And if there's perhaps a loophole of some kind in situations where lines are poorly marked that might be successful at an appeal perhaps?
Is there any obligation on the council to maintain lines clearly? Does it being faded help me at all?
I don't want to waste my time and money if this is not going to be an argument I'll win but truthfully I genuinely thought it always was (and still is) a single yellow line!
My only defense is that I am resident of 10 years and I have held the long term belief that this has always been a single yellow line as is the convention on the streets surrounding me. I.e I didn't arrive out of the blue one day and find a road that looked on the surface like a double yellow and chance it. In my situation I moved to a street 10 years ago that was marked like this and believed that the old line had been covered up and relined as a single yellow still. I've probably parked in this exact spot maybe 2 or 3 times a week for the last 10 years and never once questioned that it was a single line.
Do you not think the Google Street view photo history that I shared in my first post would support the argument that I as a resident believed I was parked on a single line and would an argument be likely to win an appeal?
I can see from the photos that the enforcement officer took that in isolation it may look like a car parked on a double yellow but when you look at the line without a car parked over it is there any argument that it wouldn't be clear to a reasonable driver if it was actually a double yellow or a single yellow that had been poorly maintained?
Having examined it quite closely now I think that it was a single line originally lined wide from the kerb to avoid the grate and then covered over and relined at a 'normal' distance to the kerb. The two line vary in width from each other as well so it's not like a freshly marked perfectly parallel line. To me this is a confusing marking of it was indeed intentionally lined this way to be a double. I'm not sure if you or anyone else knows if there are prescribed widths/distances for double yellows or a standardised way to note a transition from single to yellow? And if there's perhaps a loophole of some kind in situations where lines are poorly marked that might be successful at an appeal perhaps?
Is there any obligation on the council to maintain lines clearly? Does it being faded help me at all?
I don't want to waste my time and money if this is not going to be an argument I'll win but truthfully I genuinely thought it always was (and still is) a single yellow line!