1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Redbridge: (62(4)) Parked with one or more wheels on or over a footpath
« on: August 21, 2025, 01:09:45 pm »
Thanks and thanks to those that offered opinions/advice.
I have appealed (might as well) on the grounds that I don't believe the contravention occurred as the crossover crosses over planters/plant beds and not a footpath and no part of the vehicle encroaches on the actual footpath.
IMO that makes the cross-over part of the highway with no posted restrictions (a stretch!)
As there are many pedestrian width sections across the planters/beds on this road this crossover is obviously intended to be for vehicular access to my property and pedestrian access is a bonus, not its intention.
In mitigation I have stated that imo parking on the crossover leaving a space larger than the pedestrian access points is less of an inconvenience than parking adjacent to the crossover, blocking all pedestrian access, which would be my right as the resident. The already restricted parking available in this road and the surrounding area should make off-road parking more appealing to the council in cases like this.
Might as well throw the dice!
I have appealed (might as well) on the grounds that I don't believe the contravention occurred as the crossover crosses over planters/plant beds and not a footpath and no part of the vehicle encroaches on the actual footpath.
IMO that makes the cross-over part of the highway with no posted restrictions (a stretch!)
As there are many pedestrian width sections across the planters/beds on this road this crossover is obviously intended to be for vehicular access to my property and pedestrian access is a bonus, not its intention.
In mitigation I have stated that imo parking on the crossover leaving a space larger than the pedestrian access points is less of an inconvenience than parking adjacent to the crossover, blocking all pedestrian access, which would be my right as the resident. The already restricted parking available in this road and the surrounding area should make off-road parking more appealing to the council in cases like this.
Might as well throw the dice!