Free Traffic Legal Advice

As i have explained before we cannot dispute liability as they have a photo taken by a man who was patrolling the area! We have only ever disputed the fact we didnt get that parking charge. Why shouldn't theu accept the £60 as that was the orihional charge and what we would have paid.

Thank you. Out of interest does it make a difference they are saying its a parking charge but my husband didn't actually park the vehicle and leave it just pulled up to collect my daughter. He stayed in the vehicle the whole time. Google says there is a difference but would like to know if this could make a difference in the way they have worded it ? Thank you

Latest letter recieved today. We haven't refused to pay bridge security we have disagreed to pay the £170 as we never recieved anything from Bridge security but fully admit we didn't know we couldnt pull up ( not park ) where we did so have always offered to pay the origional £60. Thishas never been acknowledged and instead zzps keep sending letters saying we aren't corresponding. Please advise what to do now or how to respond. I did send a complaint to bridge security as someone recommended but they never responded. Thanks

Thank you. If I don't need to fill out the forms but get one of these letters what do I do then? Sorry, this is all very confusing 😕

We have done everything that wss advised. Complained to bridge security but had no response and ignored ZZPT. We have now had a letter from GCTT saying warning to transfer to solicitors. Please can someone advise what to do next. Thanks

We never recieved the original letter from bridge security and that is our whole point. If we had then we would have paid it as my husband now realises he was pulled up waiting where he shouldn't have been. He was seen and photos were taken by a foot patrol person and a penalty issued by post that we never recieved so didn't know about it until zzps wrote to us.  The V5 is up to date as we only purchased the car in March and haven't moved.
We also spoke to bridge security who apologised that we didn't get the origional letter but said there was nothing they could do as it was now with zzps.

Although I really appreciate your advice and knowledge on this i also thought you were quite rude by saying I should never have got in touch with them etc.  How was I supposed to know this exactly? I googled it to make sure it wasn't a scam and my husband did indeed park there so I think your comments were a bit harsh.
I will take the time to read your post again and aging as I am autistic so things don't go in very well and then I will make a complaint to bridge security which is what I think you suggested and will ignore any further coressnpondance from zzps and hope that is the right thing to do. Many thanks

Thank you so much. I will attatch the only two letters we have recieved and the reply to my latest email ( before you advised not to contact them. ) I would appreciate if you could let me know what I should do next. Many thanks
Good afternoon,

Reference: 146885280

Thank you for your email.

Our letter was sent to the same address as the original Parking Charge, and if you cannot recall receiving it, or are claiming it was not delivered, then perhaps you can take this up with Royal Mail. Under the Interpretation Act 1978, Section 7, (References to service by post). “Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression “serve” or the expression “give” or “send” or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post. In short, the post is deemed served two days after postage unless to the contrary is proved.

Please note, we do not purchase debt here, we work on behalf and instruction of our client.

We have reviewed your dispute and, following the Appeals Charter, can confirm that this has not been provided within a reasonable time limit to corroborate your position, and you have failed to submit an appeal within the 28 days provided by the client.

This matter has been passed to us at this stage on a debt resolution basis, and we cannot help with any dispute.

While we do not dispute you receiving said letter, our client maintains that this Parking Charge has been issued correctly and referred us to pursue payment for the balance of £170.00.

Your correspondence has been noted; however, in the absence of payment or a payment arrangement within 7 days of this email, this matter will continue to progress accordingly.

Kind regards
Avril Gates