1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Bus lane Penalty
« on: September 26, 2025, 09:29:15 pm »
Hello everyone,
please see the copy of my reps to council below as requested :
Submission Date/Time: 22/08/2025 11:50:41
Reference: MT01544199
Submission Reference: 10838528
Notes:
1.The video does not support the alleged contravention because it does not show any signage allegedly passed 2.I make this collateral challenge against the validity of the PCN as it is missing mandatory information as provided at Para.4 (8 )(v) of https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted (v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable. Clearly, this refers to Para.4(8 )(iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice statement lack clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the required information was included or not, it is also arguable that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many would view as being conjunctive. even if the statement were to be interpreted disjunctively, there is still no clarity due to the missing information .So, it follows that it cannot possibly be interpreted disjunctively
Uploaded Evidence:
please see the copy of my reps to council below as requested :
Submission Date/Time: 22/08/2025 11:50:41
Reference: MT01544199
Submission Reference: 10838528
Notes:
1.The video does not support the alleged contravention because it does not show any signage allegedly passed 2.I make this collateral challenge against the validity of the PCN as it is missing mandatory information as provided at Para.4 (8 )(v) of https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted (v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable. Clearly, this refers to Para.4(8 )(iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice statement lack clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the required information was included or not, it is also arguable that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many would view as being conjunctive. even if the statement were to be interpreted disjunctively, there is still no clarity due to the missing information .So, it follows that it cannot possibly be interpreted disjunctively
Uploaded Evidence: