1
The Flame Pit / Re: Is this TRO lawful?
« on: August 08, 2025, 12:32:17 pm »
Yes, I believe the legal process was followed except for the fact signage placed at the location contained untrue information but the council have admitted this and said that they will change the signs:
"...these restrictions are not in situ due to any highway works. Signs referring to this have been placed and erected in error and will be replaced with correct information as soon as possible this week."
I was questioning the legality of the TRO because the official reason for the TRO is because the "[council] is satisfied that traffic on the said roads should be restricted by reasons of maintaining the safety of the public" but it seems blatant to me that the reason for the TRO is to manage traffic flow. Unfortunately, I am not able to prove this belief.
"...these restrictions are not in situ due to any highway works. Signs referring to this have been placed and erected in error and will be replaced with correct information as soon as possible this week."
I was questioning the legality of the TRO because the official reason for the TRO is because the "[council] is satisfied that traffic on the said roads should be restricted by reasons of maintaining the safety of the public" but it seems blatant to me that the reason for the TRO is to manage traffic flow. Unfortunately, I am not able to prove this belief.