1
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: Today at 07:01:16 pm »
Thanks for the replies, I have until 27th July to respond.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: Today at 01:00:47 pm »
Have just seen the response to my appeal to POPLA from PPS. They are clearly talking about a completely different case in their response. They make no reference to my appeal regarding the non compliance to PoFA of their NtK (neither did they in their initial rejection to my appeal to them), they state appeal points I never raised and are clearly not relevant to my case. Should I just say they've got the wrong case & would that be a winning point?
A few other points which i'm not sure if any would be relevant at all:
They do not attach a copy of my original appeal, only their rejection of it.
The image of the NtK they show is not an exact copy of the one i received. Their copy does not have the QR code? next to my name/address or the 7 digit reference above same.
The image they show of proof from their search of JustPark that there is no evidence of any bookings for Regis Road for my vehicle is incorrect. I know this is not a point of appeal, but I have proof on my JustPark app that parking was paid for on the day in question and other days both prior to and after the date of the charge so i find it odd that it does not show up on their search.
The wording of the JustPark sign they show giving dimensions of sign differs from the actual on street signage wording.
I have attached links to my appeal to POPLA (I also submitted a copy of the NtK to them) and the PPS response and their evidence, I did not include the photo's they submitted of my vehicle again.
My appeal:
Their response:
A few other points which i'm not sure if any would be relevant at all:
They do not attach a copy of my original appeal, only their rejection of it.
The image of the NtK they show is not an exact copy of the one i received. Their copy does not have the QR code? next to my name/address or the 7 digit reference above same.
The image they show of proof from their search of JustPark that there is no evidence of any bookings for Regis Road for my vehicle is incorrect. I know this is not a point of appeal, but I have proof on my JustPark app that parking was paid for on the day in question and other days both prior to and after the date of the charge so i find it odd that it does not show up on their search.
The wording of the JustPark sign they show giving dimensions of sign differs from the actual on street signage wording.
I have attached links to my appeal to POPLA (I also submitted a copy of the NtK to them) and the PPS response and their evidence, I did not include the photo's they submitted of my vehicle again.
My appeal:
Their response:
3
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: July 18, 2026, 07:19:36 am »
Wow! Thanks again for your help and the time you put into this, as i said before it is really appreciated. Will submit to POPLA and update outcome.
4
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: July 16, 2026, 09:12:35 am »
Thank you, really appreciate it.
5
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: July 15, 2026, 05:34:05 pm »I would fight this at POPLA purely on the grounds on non-POFA compliance.
I can come up with something but as all POPLA appeals, the outcome is not predictable.
We can however say that there is a 99% likelihood of this never seeing the inside of a court room.
Give me 48 hours.
Apologies for chasing you up, but have you had a chance to come up with anything yet as i have to pay the reduced rate by tomorrow if i'm not going to POPLA.
Much appreciated, thanks.
6
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: July 13, 2026, 11:35:54 am »
Thanks, will do.
7
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: July 13, 2026, 10:45:42 am »
Received rejection as expected, is it worth fighting on grounds of PoFA non compliance only? Also just wondered if there was any valid argument re the PPSCoP in the fact that the warden wasn't prevented from putting a ticket on the vehicle at the time he took the photo's as evidence because the driver drove off or tried to stop him, but the ticket was later issued by post. Is there any argument in that the ticket was issued incorrectly or is that a waste of time raising it?
Thanks.
Thanks.
8
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 17, 2026, 04:02:58 pm »
Ok thanks, will send today.
9
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 17, 2026, 03:22:48 pm »
Is this ok as they're going to reject it anyway?
I am appealing this charge as the registered keeper as your notice is non compliant with PoFA 2012.
Schedule 4 paragraph 9(1) states: A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to keeper for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in accordance with this paragraph if the following requirements are met:
(2) The notice must
(a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates.
There is no period of parking given. A single timestamp is not sufficient.
Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) of PoFA requires that, amongst other things, the NTK warn the keeper that the parking operator is required to comply with all aspects of schedule 4 in order to rely on it.
Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) of PoFA requires that the notice must state that 'the creditor will, if all applicable conditions under this Schedule are met, have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount that remains unpaid'.
The NTK does not fully comply with all the requirements of PoFA 2012. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient, therefore PPS are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge.
I am appealing this charge as the registered keeper as your notice is non compliant with PoFA 2012.
Schedule 4 paragraph 9(1) states: A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to keeper for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in accordance with this paragraph if the following requirements are met:
(2) The notice must
(a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates.
There is no period of parking given. A single timestamp is not sufficient.
Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) of PoFA requires that, amongst other things, the NTK warn the keeper that the parking operator is required to comply with all aspects of schedule 4 in order to rely on it.
Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) of PoFA requires that the notice must state that 'the creditor will, if all applicable conditions under this Schedule are met, have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount that remains unpaid'.
The NTK does not fully comply with all the requirements of PoFA 2012. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient, therefore PPS are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge.
10
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 17, 2026, 12:47:46 pm »
No, they arrived at 10.13 and left at 11.50, it was during the meeting they realised it had expired and renewed it, but there was a 13 min period from 10.59 to 11.12 where it wasn't covered and pcn is timed at 11.10.
11
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 17, 2026, 10:04:42 am »
Anything? Have to pay today or appeal. Thanks.
12
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 16, 2026, 03:28:46 pm »
Does anyone think it's worth trying an appeal as it will end up at POPLA if it's not a strong enough point to win on?
13
Private parking tickets / Re: Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 15, 2026, 02:29:51 pm »
Does it matter that they say 'if after 29 days beginning on the day after this parking charge is given' instead of 28 days as stated in PoFA?
And re: the period of parking, they do have images covering a period from 11.04 to 11.11 so would that nullify that point anyway?
And re: the period of parking, they do have images covering a period from 11.04 to 11.11 so would that nullify that point anyway?
14
Private parking tickets / Private Parking Solutions NTK Regis Road
« on: June 15, 2026, 11:55:02 am »
Hi All, received this notice on 8th June. The driver had taken a relative to an emergency appointment with a psychologist at the Mental Health Crisis Centre in Regis Rd. They also attended the meeting. Parking was paid for on the JustPark app from 10.13 to 10.58, unfortunately (due to the nature of the meeting) they didn't realise the parking had expired, but as soon as they did they paid for a further period of parking from 11.13 to 11.50. The Parking charge was issued at 11.10. Is there anything wrong with the NTK? Do you think there's any point at all in appealing on the grounds that due to it being a serious mental health crisis it was a genuine mistake in not extending the parking on time. As can be seen in the JustPark app the driver was parking every/every other day whilst attending the Mental Health Crisis Centre with the relative. Or should it just be paid as reduced rate expires tomorrow. Any help or advice really appreciated. Thanks.
[/url)
[url=https://ibb.co/DgPx2Fxd]
[/url)[url=https://ibb.co/DgPx2Fxd]
15
Private parking tickets / Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« on: April 27, 2026, 11:23:05 am »
Appeal allowed!! Thanks for all your help it is very much appreciated
