Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - osa

Pages: [1] 2
2
Cause I thought it was okay to as the whole road on pavement parking also in a bit of a hurry.

4
Show how my car blocks the path for less abled people and could damage the pipes in the ground but the car LITREALLY in front is okay to park there

7
Thank you for writing to us regarding the above Penalty Charge Notice.We have carefully considered what you say but we have decided not to cancel yourPenalty Charge Notice (PCN).You were issued a PCN for parking with one wheel (or more) on the pavement or off theroad. Pavement or off-road parking is not allowed unless signs say otherwise. This ruleapplies 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and is enforced because vehicles:• can get in the way of pedestrians, especially blind people or people with prams; and• can damage paving or underground pipes.This rule applies to disabled badge holders too; it is not a situation where you may useyour disabled badge.

8
the following is my appeal letter is it okay if i reference the case posted by stamfordman if not ill take it off


I am writing to challenge the above Penalty Charge Notice on the grounds that I believed I was parked lawfully and that the signage and road layout at the location are inadequate to clearly indicate any prohibition on footway parking.


I was displaying a valid Blue Badge and parked where I genuinely believed footway parking was permitted. This belief was reinforced by signs placed in the main road that appear to indicate footway parking is allowed. However, the signs used are prescribed for area-wide exemptions (Item 12 of Schedule 7 of the TSRGD 2016), not individual parking places. These signs are not accompanied by any termination signs, so it was reasonable to assume the exemption applied continuously into the adjoining road where I parked.

There are also no compliant signs or markings in Amhurst Gardens to indicate either:

The start or end of any permitted footway parking area, or

That the area I parked in was not covered by the exemption indicated on the main road.

This lack of clarity created a legitimate expectation that footway parking was still permitted at the location. The signage used by the council does not comply with the regulatory requirements under the TSRGD 2016, making enforcement in this context questionable.

If the authority does not intend to cancel the PCN, I request that you provide:

A copy of the council resolution or traffic order that lawfully permits or restricts footway parking in the relevant location, and

Any signage diagrams, markings, or maps showing where footway parking begins and ends, including evidence that appropriate termination signs are in place as required.

I also refer to case 2200184855 (Adam Miller v LB Hounslow) in which the adjudicator found insufficient clarity in the signage and traffic markings in a similar situation.

In light of the unclear and possibly unlawful signage, I respectfully request that the PCN be cancelled.

10
Could you please advise me on how to phrase my appeal to support my case?


12
Ill try to make a draft but is  there there a source to say that you cannot have a footway parking contagious with a DYL on the carriage way.

13
Sorry, I'm confused. What's this?




This is what I found regarding the footway parking in Hounslow.

In London Borough of Hounslow, footway parking is generally banned, but there are exceptions where it might be permitted if specific criteria are met. These exceptions are outlined in the council's policy, which dictates that a minimum footway width of 1.5 meters must be maintained for pedestrians, and the footway should not be damaged by parked vehicles according to Hounslow Democratic Services

15
PCN IS NJ42443860

ref LT12DFL


PCN is NJ42443860, reference LT12DFL. I only have this picture of the PCN, as I am working right now, but the code is 622.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Pages: [1] 2