Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - applecrate

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hi all,

I have finally recieved an invite to attend/recieve a mediation call. Just to sense check this, is the guidance still inline with the advice outlined in the last post in this thread:

https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/dcb-legal-on-behalf-of-euro-carparks-claim-form-received-defence-needs-submittin/msg88670/#msg88670

Copied from post for ref:

For the mediation call, the only requirement is for you "attend" the call. It is not part of the judicial process and no judge is involved.

This is what I advise you to say when you receive the call from the mediator:

“Before I set out my position, please confirm from the claimant’s side:

• the full name of the person attending for them;
• their role/position at their legal representative’s firm; and
• whether they hold written authority to negotiate and settle today.

Please relay that back to me before we continue.”

After the mediator calls back...

If identified and authority confirmed:

“Thank you. I’m content to proceed on that basis. My settlement offer is £0, or I invite the claimant to discontinue with no order as to costs.”

If no/unclear authority:

“Please record that the claimant’s attendee has not confirmed settlement authority. My position remains that liability is denied and my offer is £0, subject to prompt approval by an authorised solicitor if they choose to discontinue.”

If the mediator probes your defence:

”In what capacity are you asking that question? Are you legally trained?  If not, please refrain from offering opinions. I will be reporting any attempt to do so as inappropriate.”

All you need to know is the name and the position of the person acting for the claimant and report that back to us. It will be over within minutes. Complete waste of time otherwise.

2
Thanks - so just to be clear, I should expect a copy in the mail?

3
Hi all,

Have had a change in the claim history/status on the MCOL website as follows:

https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/IQBYhuj9xdUhQKU3XzwqHyLNAVNpJdu1YCjfSxy_BPSYrMU?e=Jnacab

What does this mean? Have not recieved anything further in the post or email that I've seen.Is there something more I need to fill out/return? Or is it still just a case of hurry up & wait?

4
Hi all, just checking in. Have not received any further notice yet since the receipt/acknowledgement of my defense on MCOL e.g. no N180 either in the post or otherwise. Question, is there a time limit by which this needs to occur as its been over a month now since my defense was recorded.

5
Thanks for the super quick note, genuinely appreciated. I have checked MCOL & there is no notification or update as yet beyond confirm of my original defense submission, so will hold fire until such times as that updates per your guidance.

6
Cheers have found the informationm I need here:

https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/dcb-legal-on-behalf-of-euro-carparks-claim-form-received-defence-needs-submittin/msg88670/#msg88670

The only thing I am not clear on however is how long I have to respond. I recieved DCB's questionnaire on 5th Jan. I've downloaded & completed the N180 form as suggested in the above post, but just want to confirm what sort of timeframe I have to email this in as per the explanation on the above thread?

7
Yes, you will receive a letter saying that they have reviewed your defence and their client intends to proceed and a copy of their N180 DQ.

You are spot on once again b789. DCB Legal have emailed me the following email & attached N180.

Email: https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/IQDiOViv9mq3QpVuyj6foawsAeQQicsh-FxaI-18kvoa5QM?e=CxV0kc

N180: https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/IQCfQgicEG77SpKYvfeNjPlYAa7Rkfwil5ra85JLBh5lv2c?e=mo8U8e

There does not appear to be any updates on the MCOL website yet if that means anything.

So the 64,000 peso question is - what next?


8
Quick update just for info & benefit of others like me who do not know this process at all - recieved acknowlegdement/recipet of defence submission, so now assume we wait for DCBL to reply, if at all.

Link to scan of court reciept letter:
https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/IQDgY64MxWwYQ5R5ZB6AsqHDAQIJNwh5tWhqKREECTh-CMQ?e=FfnDn1


9
Many thanks for this - I would not have known to do any of this without your help & probably would have fubar'd it as yuou noted. I've pasted the text into the appropriate field on the MCOL website & have submitted. I assume its now a case of hurry up & wait for their reply/assessment?

10
Thanks for the guidance. I've searched the forum & found this thread which I think covers the main actions to take? Just so I get this right, I assume I now have to submit an AoS (Acknowledgement of Service), and then a personalised copy of the defence template quoted in the thread e.g. "in the County Court between Vehicle Control Services Ltd" etc (obviously adjusting for my particular details).

This is then to be emailed to the prescribed email address in the thread (claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk) noting claim number etc. There is alos a copy of a draft order for defence - should I include this also?

https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/vcs-parked-after-expiry-time-powis-car-park-woolwich/msg69322/#msg69322

11
Hi all,

It would appear the previous letter above didn't have the desired effect e.g. they have now (or the court has) issued a claim - see attached/linked scan. They have also applied a huge amount of interest bring the claim value now up to £320, from the original £170.

This has now defiintiely gone beyond my level of expertise & experience/knowledge. What can I do now? Am I locked into paying the fully unjustified amount, or is there any way to push back on this to get them to go bury their heads once & for all?

As always, any & all guidance gratefully accepted.

https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/IQBOYgEoeDu8R7lr72D_PaH-AaLD95DkTh3onJCcpoLcqkY?e=35REbY


12
Hi all,
Have finally had a response to my previous email from DCB & it comes as no surprise I guess that they are sticking to their guns. On my part this is getting beyond my comfort zone & area of experience/knowledge, so once again need to lean on this group for advice & direction please.

Here is a link to the email & the attached evidence they refer to which are a coupleof photos - one of my car & the other is the sign at the car park.

DCB email: https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/EdUGZEMd-qpCklq4cPFSl0sBw7WTECACX6LdoP2JXFb5wg?e=rri6HG
Photo of car: https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/Ea327k3Je5xNh2xmNafxT3ABITnMSoTcjXngH11wkrtZuQ?e=06eksu
Photo of sign: https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/EUEa5h6fi0tMv2obWZl0MDcBElv6GH9DxqPAIYcLIlH59Q?e=o4K39u

Any guidance on how/when/what to reply with here from this point forward will be much appreciated!!!

TIA!!

13
Does 'Claude' always write like it's generating clickbait content for an online tabloid?  ;D

It does read bit like that doesnt it!!  ;D  ;D  ;D

I use it for work to generate insights into businesses I work with & it is VERY useful for that I must say.

Lets hope it has come to the right conclusion on DCBL  ;)

14
Hi all,

Quick updateon my above situation. I have used one of b789's LOC responses email templates & now await DCBL response. Out of curiosity, I have also run the email template through my Claude Pro Ai account using the following prompt:

I have just sent the following email (being the LOC template) to DCBL on this matter - please analyse the likely next actions by DCBL or potential outcome

The resulting output from Claude massivley reinforces b789's recommended approach (whatever your view on Ai output is):

https://1drv.ms/b/c/46ae79d8cea5d38a/EQ58b3sGzy5Lvfqrj-zbGTkB3R0nyiaFcEnvv_9ePHDAGA?e=epWQQp

15
Hi all,

A further update to the above thread.I have just recoeved a Letter of Claim from DCBLLegal & have shared a scanned/redcated copy here for reference. I've also attached the original PCN for ref. If needs be, can also share all other correspondnece I have recieved from them on this matter.

The question now is, what happens now? Do I continue to ignore this or do I need to act now as guided by jfollows above? Given I have also recently lost my job due to a restructure, I could certainly do without this unwarranted & unfair issues dragging on, let alone pay the so called fine.

Any guidance now this appears to have ramped is much appreciated.

DCBL letter of claim 080925_Redacted

Smart Parking ticket redacted

Pages: [1] 2