Show Posts - km123

I'm really confused. So what do I do? Ok I can say not guilty to speeding and put in the mitigation that a driver was nominated. But the failure to provide the drivers identity, although I did initially, I didn't respond to the follow up questions (on the basis I asked the nominated driver to provide the info) but assuming that won't stand, as the interim letter asking for more details was addressed to me.

There are 2 charges. If I say not guilty to the speeding surely they won't just say ok no problem, they'll want to look into it further, someone needs to be charged for the speeding! The nominated driver hasn't responded to the additional information and so therefore the charge has defaulted back to me.

Because how do I prove I wasn't the driver, when the car is registered to me and I'm unable to obtain the additional information that was asked of me (and missed the deadline to do this). I don't want to go guilty but equally don't want to put myself in a worse situation, I just wanted this sorted.

Hello,I received a speeding letter (83 in a 70) back in October, I replied within time with a nominated driver, a friend. In December I then received a a further letter advising that after initial checks, the nominated driver is not named on the insurance (fully comp on own insurance) and therefore if I wish to proceed with the nomination to provide the nominated drivers, driving licence, insurance details etc. I sent this to my friend and asked him to send these details directly to the email address on the letter, to which he said he did. (appreciate it was my responsibility to reply directly). Anyway, 3 months has passed and last week I received a SJP outlining two charges, the original speeding plus failure to provide driver details. The evidence within the SJP shows the pictures of the car, plus the letters that have been sent, but not the 'interim letter' or any mention of me nominating another driver, which I therefore think means it has just defaulted back to me.I have tried to contact said friend, who is ignoring me, so I suspect didn't ever email the additional information and obviously no longer wants to admit and take those 3 points or fine. I am now at a loss as to how to reply to the SJP. Do I:> Plead guilty to both charges - I believe will carry 9 points and whilst I don't have any other points, this is less than ideal. However, I have no proof to show it wasn't me driving, the cars in my name, and the nominated driver clearly isn't going to own up> Plead guilty to the speeding but not the failure to provide - I have read this is the preferable thing to do as you can 'bargain' in your mitigation so that only the original 3 points are given. However, how can I say this when I did initially respond and provide the driver details > Plead not guilty to both on the basis I believe it wasn't me that was driving and that I did initially respondAny advice welcome!