Show Posts - bethlclap

Here is the reverse side. Please let me know if the other two are required as well to assist. Thank you. [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Attached is the redacted front side. I have three of these in sequential order from the 12th to the 14th. [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Fantastic, is it suitable to reply with a photo of them to this thread? Will send them when home.

No, the appeal was for a charge done last year and rejected despite payment shown. It was written as the registered keeper with no indication of knowing the identity of the driver.These 4 haven’t been appealed. The contravention was breaching the terms of parking by not having a valid payment/permit, when payment was made for all these days however that doesn’t seem to matter with APCOA. Payment was made using the APCOA connect app for card payment, using the correct vehicle registration. The site operates ANPR on entry and exit, with only one location/parking site number available for selection in the app.If you could inform me of a response to get them cancelled it would be appreciated, I do know the golden rule never to admit to the identity of the driver.

It is three days to the appeal stage end for three of them. On the last received one got a few weeks. I do plan to just ignore them, appealed before and shown receipt of parking and they just reject regardless.The beyond necessary data it requires is address, credit card/debit card details on account creation and phone number. You then need to enter payment details again separately on parking payment. It gives you the options of Apple Pay, debit card etc. So why does account creation require a card number? The users address also is not required data in this instance so why is it forced as a condition of use? The app is an inappropriate use of personal data.I do apologise if my initial post was in breach of the rules or formatted incorrectly, my main question is, do multiple parking charges stack and lead to increased severity in outcomes (CCJ) rather than empty threats?

Good Afternoon,As the registered keeper, I currently have in my possession 4 APCOA private parking fines for Loughborough University and I’m sure to receive more. Payment was made for parking on every day, and despite this and receipt shown the appeal, kept simple only stating payment paid was rejected.I’ve read through the advice about APCOA being benign and a non threat, and I plan to ignore them however I just wanted to enquire whether having multiple charges (4 in total) may lead to them taking more action than a standard single and leading to a CCJ.Further to this, the APCOA connect website/app is in gross breach of the GDPR and should be subject to investigation due to the beyond necessary data it attempts to harvest in order to pay for parking.Thank you for any assistance.