Show Posts - Ruthie27

The driver has already written to Bank Park Management Ltd twice in terms which would have revealed that they were the driver.If the driver goes ahead and emails to ask for a Subject Access Request - is it likely that Bank Park will match up the details with the previous emails and therefore know who the driver is?

Thank you both.  The driver will request a subject access request as you suggest and take photos as soon as possible.  Many thanks.

Thank you.The driver had parked in the same place many times when visiting the same company they did not notice any signs.  They will go back and visit to see what is there asap.  They thought that the fact they had signed in to the company's parking register was evidence that they were  not committing an offence.

The driver received a "Notice of Debt Recovery" letter from dcbl (Direct Collections Bailiffs Ltd) about an unpaid Parking Charge of £160.00 on 15 August relating to an alleged offence on 19 June 2023.They had parked outside the business they was visiting and entered their car reg and name onto the company's digital system (there is evidence of this). When the driver called dcbl, dcbl said they had sent out previous letters - which had gone to the driver's previous address which they left 3 years ago.  (The driver had not updated my log book -  didn't know that they had to).  They have since updated my log book.There is no photographic evidence given in the letter from dcbl.  The driver does not think they were in an unauthorised zone.The letter states "you are no longer able to appeal the penalty charge.  Your next opportunity to dispute the charge would be if the matter was taken to court" The driver called Bank Park Mgmt Ltd but could not get through so then emailed to appeal and to ask for photographic evidence.Can anyone advise what the legal situation is here? [ Guests cannot view attachments ]