Show Posts - prophet01

A fact is a fact.The arguement wouldn't be witha judge in the first instance, it would be with the company who might just capitulate.

The sign specifies three "conditions" of parking.It then goes on to state the penalty for breaching the "terms" of parking.The sign does not specify any "terms" of parking.Suficient ambiguity to argue any attempted penalty imposition for failing to comply with unspecified "terms"The phrase "Terms & Conditions" springs to mind.