on 26 Jan, 2025 18:44 in Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on)
I've just found that evidence is available on https://towerhamlets.tarantoportal.com/PCN/ViewImages using the PCN number (TT58451082) and contravention code (21). There are 51 images in total, I have attached the most relevant at the bottom of this post.From these, I see that seven bays were suspended for one day for tree works. However, the suspension notice does not include a "display date," which seems unusual. Current suspension notices in the area do include this information - for example, a notice outside my house for 27th-28th January states it was erected on xxth January. From the evidence images, there’s no clear indication of when warning of the suspension was provided.After reviewing the images, I should revise my earlier comments. Given the location of the suspension notice, at least 2-3 car lengths behind where I parked, I suppose it’s possible the notice was in place on 16th January but was obscured by parked vehicles. Since my house is in the opposite direction, I wouldn’t have walked past the notice after parking, which might explain why I didn’t see it.One observation: in the evidence photos, my rear right tyre is clearly inflated. This provides good evidence that the puncture occurred while the car was in the council’s care, either during towing or storage.Lastly, the final few evidence photos are confusing. They show generic line drawings of a car marked up with yellow lines as if to indicate extensive pre-existing damage across the entire vehicle. I’ve attached an example below, but similar images exist for all sides. These markings don’t reflect the actual condition of my car, as seen in the other evidence photos. This seems like an overly broad attempt to pre-empt damage claims. Has anyone encountered this kind of evidence before?


