1
Speeding and other criminal offences / Re: x7 Fixed Penalties in 3 days. x3 SJPs , 24 points, £1700 and counting ....
« on: February 01, 2025, 03:21:32 pm »
A quick recap and update, followed by a new question...
I've spoken to the police and to the courts (both were really helpful)
I had received 7 NIPS .It turns out I had indeed totally messed up the submission of all seven (not provided lic details)
From the 6 remaining NIPS I got three Single Justice Procedures (all in different London courts)
I'd pleaded guilty online to all three.
One of the SJP's has been heard - for which I got a £1212 fine and 4 points (bringing my total to 10pts)
For the two other SJPs I have received separate 'Notice of proposed driving disqualification'. one for each
The other three NIPs are not being prosecuted as six months had passed since the offence. (This is what the police told me).
This is the situation to date.
I am asking the courts to hear the two cases together (courts suggested this, and told me how to go about it)
I also intend to ask the court to take into account or review the SJP that has already been heard. (ie to linkup all three SJPs)
I intend to go to court to plead my case. I don't intend to pay for a Solicitor.
I would like to ask advice for this please:
Should I mention the fact that I had 7 NIPS to the court? I'm not being charged for the three NIPS that the police failed to prosecute, so should I not mention them? or must I?
I'm inclined to be honest, but I don't want to incriminate myself further.
Note: When I originally returned the 7 NIPS (all together in one envelope) I enclosed a cover letter in which I mentioned the fact I was returning 'all seven NIPS'. Each SJP contained a copy of this letter, so the court knows this fact.
I've spoken to the police and to the courts (both were really helpful)
I had received 7 NIPS .It turns out I had indeed totally messed up the submission of all seven (not provided lic details)
- SAC
- SJP - court £1212 & 4 points
- SJP - NoPDD (awaiting hearing)
- SJP - NoPDD (awaiting hearing)
- not prosecuted
- not prosecuted
- not prosecuted
From the 6 remaining NIPS I got three Single Justice Procedures (all in different London courts)
I'd pleaded guilty online to all three.
One of the SJP's has been heard - for which I got a £1212 fine and 4 points (bringing my total to 10pts)
For the two other SJPs I have received separate 'Notice of proposed driving disqualification'. one for each
The other three NIPs are not being prosecuted as six months had passed since the offence. (This is what the police told me).
This is the situation to date.
I am asking the courts to hear the two cases together (courts suggested this, and told me how to go about it)
I also intend to ask the court to take into account or review the SJP that has already been heard. (ie to linkup all three SJPs)
I intend to go to court to plead my case. I don't intend to pay for a Solicitor.
I would like to ask advice for this please:
Should I mention the fact that I had 7 NIPS to the court? I'm not being charged for the three NIPS that the police failed to prosecute, so should I not mention them? or must I?
I'm inclined to be honest, but I don't want to incriminate myself further.
Note: When I originally returned the 7 NIPS (all together in one envelope) I enclosed a cover letter in which I mentioned the fact I was returning 'all seven NIPS'. Each SJP contained a copy of this letter, so the court knows this fact.
)