Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - crxvtec

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
When I called them, the debt hadn't been registered. I called them back and it hadn't been registered then either. Then Christmas/New Year happened and I forgot all about it.

3
Assuming you made reps. wait for the Order for Recovery and TE form then show it.

I've received the Order for Recovery of Unpaid Penalties today. Should I just repeat the representations I made prior or is there anything further I should add?

4
I've received a NIP letter and downloaded the pack of evidence here:

https://ibb.co/fdXJjTCW
https://ibb.co/3m3tJjYM
https://ibb.co/spn8NHjv
https://ibb.co/21nBfnKb
https://ibb.co/WLjWdtZ
https://ibb.co/B53R0dj8
https://ibb.co/7NVyPw36

The number plate is barely legible in one photo and illegible in others. Does this allow grounds to contest?

Thank you,

C.

5
OK...would it be worth asking the council for their response to my representations in the meantime? I wouldn't want them to suggest that I never made them (they were made directly into their website so they could "conveniently" lose them...)

6
I have heard nothing since my last submission. I have now received this.

https://ibb.co/5xMkgLSk

I have been waiting for a response or cancellation but nothing arrived to date until this letter.

I also noticed that a previous PCN has been cancelled under appeal for the same circumstances: BT19070959

What should I do next?

7
Quote
adequate information
You have to demonstrate to an adjudicator that the signage is inadequate. The problem with what is adequate and what is not, is subjective. The council will always refuse your reps, because they won't consider their own signage as anything less than perfect.

Here's what I submitted.

Regulation 18 (1) of The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996:

"(a)before the order comes into force, the placing on or near the road of such traffic signs in such positions as the order making authority may consider requisite for securing that adequate information as to the effect of the order is made available to persons using the road;"

If you look at the placement of the restriction signs relative to the road junction, these signs aren't clearly legible when approaching the junction from St. Michael's Road, as happened in this instance, therefore there is only reliance on the advance warning sign, and the advance warming sign falls short of the required standard as it is bent out of shape, as evidenced in photos https://ibb.co/gZDgWN4H https://ibb.co/xKP98Jpr and https://ibb.co/p6kxxd6H

https://ibb.co/LzpBddWj shows that the nearside restriction sign placement is "side on" from St. Michael's Road, and therefore illegible. It also shows the far side sign is too close to the junction,  under a metre from the kerb, and in order to read it before passing it, the driver would need to be looking out of the side window, instead of the windscreen, when taking the right turn from St. Michael's Road to Mora Road. This is evidenced here: https://ibb.co/LhBzgF4X and the opposite perspective is shown here: https://ibb.co/Q7swJr27

Further, the camera evidence doesn't show any of the restriction signs - it simply shows a vehicle driving down a road at a given time.

In summary, the advance warning sign is damaged, one restriction sign cannot be read at all due to it being side on to St. Michael's Road, and the third restriction sign could only be read if not looking in the direction of travel, i.e., if driving without due care and attention, and that too only for a very brief moment during the right turn before that sign too becomes illegible as it would be side on. Without adequate information being presented to the driver, the offence did not occur and the PCN should be cancelled.

I note also that the website only allowed me to submit a general representation; it didn't have the various options that the form had. Please see https://ibb.co/Y5MTHz3

8
Just considering the point below:

"(a)before the order comes into force, the placing on or near the road of such traffic signs in such positions as the order making authority may consider requisite for securing that adequate information as to the effect of the order is made available to persons using the road;"

If you look at the placement of the signs relative to the road junction I think there's argument that the signs aren't clearly legible when approaching the junction from St. Michael's Road, as happened in this instance, therefore there is only reliance on the advance warning sign, and we've evidenced that the advance warming sign falls short of the required standard.

https://ibb.co/LzpBddWj shows that the nearside sign is side on from St. Michael's Road and therefore illegible. It also shows the far side sign is around a metre from the kerb and in order to read it before passing it, the driver would need to be looking out of the side window, instead of the windscreen, when taking the right turn from St. Michael's Road to Mora Road. This is evidenced here: https://ibb.co/LhBzgF4X and the opposite perspective is shown here: https://ibb.co/Q7swJr27

In summary, the advance warning sign is damaged, one restriction sign cannot be read at all due to it being side on to St. Michael's Road, and the third sign could only be read if not looking in the direction of travel, i.e., if driving without due care and attention, and that too only for a very brief moment during the right turn before that sign too becomes illegible as it would be side on.

9
I've noted that the signage before the turn is all bent out of shape and doesn't face the roadway squarely.

https://ibb.co/album/gM8p2r

I expect that this falls below the required standard for signage...does anyone know?

10
Looking at the PCN Key events, this has all happened 3 months after alleged PCN issue:
https://ibb.co/BV3dKkZf

Also the colour images showing the car don't show the VRM; only a black and white still shows the VRM but that then doesn't show the car. Would that be insufficient evidence?

11
Yes it is my company's name and address in the PCN.

13
I have a PCN notification dated 11/03/25 for an event recorded on 05/12/24.

I would have thought that they'd need to send this within a month of the event, not over 3 months later.

Details here: https://ibb.co/album/gM8p2r

Location here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/R4xLoXaMG97YBavC7

14
We ended up paying this, as it wasn't worth the time calling up TEC and sitting on hold week in week out for hours on end.

15
Understood sir. I am a director/shareholder of the lessee company.

Pages: [1] 2 3