1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Penalty 51j failing to comply with a No Entry sign - camera enforcement (Kensington borough - Launceston Place junct
« on: September 30, 2025, 05:54:28 pm »
Unfortunately, the outcome was not in my favour. The adjudicator chose to completely ignore the previous decision, fair enough - but strangely he couldn't come up with any reason for doing so. In his ruling, he says he is equally ignoring two other decisions which found in favour of the authority that were brought in as evidence by the council, even though we both agreed those cases were irrelevant to this case as they did not have to do with the main argument I put forward for my case - that the No entry sign does not apply to the cycle lane. The adjudicator based his decision on the fact that because I dismounted prior to using the cycle lane showed that I must have known there was a restriction. Not sure why the adjudicator applies the law here based on how I "felt" or "behaved" at the time. I thought my case was for him to rule whether the sign applies to the cycle lane or not, irrespective if you go through it on the motorbike or dismounting first. He says the sign applies and therefore I am liable for the penalty. Outcome here - https://tinyurl.com/yc2sec45