Free Traffic Legal Advice

Hi All, Could you please review my representation letter

Dear Sir/madam,

Re: PCN: GX19893768

I am writing to add more information for my representation to challenge the issuance of the above PCN, which I believe is due to a misreading of my vehicle's license plate.
On 01/11/2024 at 18:00, I was working from home and have provided proof of an office meeting that occurred during this time. Therefore, I could not have been at London Westhorne Avenue.

Upon reviewing the DVD evidence provided, I have identified a significant error. The vehicle captured in the video/image is clearly a Mercedes Benz GLC 300, which can be easily distinguished from my Volvo XC90.

Key Differences:
1. Rear Lights: The vehicle in the image has horizontally mounted rear lights, typical of a Mercedes Benz GLC 300. In contrast, the Volvo XC90 has vertically mounted rear lights on the D-pillar.
!image: PCN_Challenge4.jpg

Where as a Volvo’s rear light looks like the below

!image: pcn_challenge7.jpeg

2. Rear Quarter Window: The rear quarter window in the image matches that of a Mercedes Benz GLC 300, not a Volvo XC90. I have included images for comparison:
• Volvo XC90: Volvo XC90 Rear Quarter Window
!image: pcn_challenge8.jpeg

• Mercedes Benz GLC 300: Mercedes Benz GLC 300 Rear Quarter Window

!image: PCN_challenge5.jpeg
The rear quarter window glass in the below image doesn’t looks like a Volvo.

Sample picture of Merc GLC rear quarter window glass

3. Wheel Disc: The wheel disc design in the image differs significantly from that of my Volvo XC90. Below is an image of my car's wheel disc for comparison: !My Car's Wheel Disc
Volvo wheel disc:
!image:


Merc Wheel disc:

4. License Plate: My car's license plate has the dealer’s name "Riverside" printed on it, which is not visible in the image of the car that entered the yellow junction box.


License plate of the car in that incident:



Given these distinct differences, it appears that there has been a misreading of the license plate, leading to the incorrect issuance of this PCN. The car involved in this incident is not mine and clearly looks like a license plate misread.
There is no clone; the car in the photo is not mine, it has a different number plate, and it is not the same make/model as mine.
I kindly request that you review the photographic evidence closely and consider the clear distinctions between a Mercedes Benz GLC 300 and a Volvo XC90, and cancel this PCN.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Hi All,

I have received a letter stating that I'm required to provide a proof of my car being at my location at the given time of the incident.
As my floodlight camera is not working, I dont have any proof of my car being parked at my garage.However going thru the DVD shared by the TFL, it looks like Merc GLC200 and I can compare those images of that car and write a detailed explanation.
Could you please advice what are the other docs that help me to add more value to this explanation.
Many thanks

Im not able to view the entire representation passage. However I have attached the PCN status history.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

I am writing to formally appeal the Penalty Charge Notice issued to me for an alleged traffic violation on 01/11/2024 at 17:11, regarding "Entering and stopping in a box junction when prohibited" at Baring Road/Westhorne Avenue.

I believe this notice has been issued in error for the following reasons:

My vehicle was parked in my garage at my home in midlands at the time of the incident and have not travelled to London. I was working from home on an office commitment and did not travel to London that day.
The license plate in the photographic evidence attached to the PCN does not match my car's license plate. I have included a photograph of my car's license plate for your review.

My Google Maps activity clearly indicates no travel to London or its vicinity on the date in question. I have attached this record as evidence.
I respectfully request that this PCN be reviewed and canceled based on the provided evidence.
After examining the video footage provided on the DVD, it is evident that the vehicle involved in the incident was a Mercedes-Benz GLC with the license plate GV22 JDX, and not my vehicle with the license plate GY22 JDX.

I m have made a representation and its under review. Can anyone suggest better ways to prove them that I was not in the place of the incident.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]