1
Speeding and other criminal offences / Re: Unsigned in Scotland - split from hijacked thread
« on: November 21, 2024, 04:54:17 pm »Why do you feel inclined to write back at all?
Fair comment.
So in this instance I should just ignore?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
Fair comment.
So in this instance I should just ignore?
2
Speeding and other criminal offences / Re: Unsigned in Scotland - split from hijacked thread
« on: November 21, 2024, 04:26:12 pm »It was probably deliberate, hoping you will just fold and accept the CoFP.
I thought that was a possibility too.
Any advice on my next move?
I had considered writing back to clarify I had only responded to satisfy the conditions of S172 and response was not an admission to guilt.
However I was aware I need to be careful with how I would word that so not to trip myself up?
3
Speeding and other criminal offences / Unsigned in Scotland - split from hijacked thread
« on: November 21, 2024, 02:05:35 pm »So far, it has always been a staring competition. The PF has always blinked when the accused turns up to court on the day of the trial and maintained his not guilty plea.
So far, it has always been a staring competition. The PF has always blinked when the accused turns up to court on the day of the trial and maintained his not guilty plea.
I recently sent the form back completed & unsigned to comply with S172 & then received the conditional offer, as stated above normally they would notice it was unsigned and post back asking for it to be signed or knock on the door of home address.
Has anyone else seen this?
Is it likely just clerical error on behalf of the issuing police force?
Thanks
Pages: [1]