Show Posts - cysb7y5wp8

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

They are represented by Gladstones Solicitors.Particulars of the claim is literally:"The driver of the vehicle with registration XXXXX parked in breach of the terms of parking stipulated on the signage (the 'Contract') at <address> on XXXX thus incurring the parking charge (the PCN). The PCN was not paid within 28 days of issue. The claimant claims the unpaid PCN from the Defendant as the driver/keeper of the Vehicle. Despite demands being made, the Defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability. The claimant claims £80 for the PCN, £60 contractual costs pursuant to the contract and PCN terms."

To be honest, I am looking for an advice regarding the process of supplying my video recording to CNBC in the hopes of getting this claim dismissed.

Received a parking change notice from UK Car Park Management (UKCPM).They claim my vehicle had been parked in breach of terms and conditions at their parking near a shop in Berkshire (England).There are two pictures on the PCN. One stating 13:29, another 14:23 on the same day.Incident time listed as 14:23. UKCPM has never sent me the details about which terms were breached. When I checked the sign near the parking lot, it says parking is allowed for max 30 minutes with no returns.My vehicle was nowhere near that parking at 14:23 on that day though. It was parked at my drive about 8 miles away.I recorded a dash-cam video my vehicle entering my drive at 14:11 and staying there for an hour (well after 14:23).Also I have a receipt from a shop near my home at 14:04.I appealed the PCN but UKCPM never replied.About a month ago I received a claim form from CNBC.The particulars of the claim:"The driver of the vehicle with registration XXXXX parked in breach of the terms of parking stipulated on the signage (the 'Contract') at <address> on XXXX thus incurring the parking charge (the PCN). The PCN was not paid within 28 days of issue. The claimant claims the unpaid PCN from the Defendant as the driver/keeper of the Vehicle. Despite demands being made, the Defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability. The claimant claims £80 for the PCN, £60 contractual consts pursuant to the contract and PCN terms."I sent my defense stating that I have video recording contradicting claimant's PCN must be invalid thus rendering whole claim false.Now I've received Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track and have until 26 November to send back the questionnaire.I am a bit lost here. I expected the next step would be where I'd send my evidence to CNBC and then whole claim would be dismissed as it makes no sense.There was clearly a mistake