Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Fuzuki

Pages: [1]
1
Nice to see a previously won appeal with similar circumstances. I'll draft a version tomorrow and share but in the meantime just sharing what my lease says about PCN (that's all I could find on both my online and paper agreement):



The website also had an FAQ stating:

As [Leasing company] are the registered keeper of the vehicle, Penalty Charge Notices (PCN's) will be addressed to us and come to us in the first instance. As legislation requires immediate payment, we will usually pay this on your behalf and then pass this charge on to you by sending an invoice and supporting documents. Please note you will still be able to appeal the PCN.

2
Hey H C Andersen,

Thanks! Just to clarify, I did not believe that registering after the fact would help - I was just mentioning that my wife did, but fully agreed with your assessment it is unlikely to help.

Really appreciate you taking the time to write this up. This seems sound to me, hopefully that will help once I send the appeal.

However this is a lease car, so the V5C is registered with the lease company. Does that change anything in the appeal process? (It's the first car I don't own outright so unsure of any potential difference!)

Draft a challenge and post here. Include a request for the off-street traffic order.

Will do later tonight, thanks. May I ask what the off-street traffic order is?

3
The terms suggest the correct contravention is not having a valid ticket.

Can you actually pay a charge here or is it limited to 3 hours free.

No you can't pay a charge. You can only use Ringgo (or apparently call) to get 3 free hours, starting from the time you "buy".


It seems obvious from the car park conditions board, namely three hours free, maximum stay three hours. SO the only reason to "buy" a ticket, is to check people only stay for 3 hours or less. Of course it is not totally free because in order to "buy" a ticket, one has to use Ringo and pay their 20p fee.

There's actually no fee when using Ringgo in this car park!

This is an example of the app summary of a session:




4
Here is the board:



Note that when taking a ticket on Ringgo it doesn't allow you to backdate, the 3 hours always start from the moment you take the ticket. There's no machine to obtain a ticket from, only Ringgo.

Based off the T&C's it sounds like I might not have good grounds for appeal? Except if the contravention code is indeed incorrect due to the payment wording?

5
Oh, I see - that would mean that even if I got the ticket after the PCN, it would be valid for the time of the PCN (depending on the T&C's I guess).

I'll be back there tomorrow, I'll take a picture and report back! Thank you.

6
Thanks for your answer.

"As a session was taken out the missing time was not chargeable"

Could you explain what you mean here, sorry? I'm not sure to understand it correctly.

But if my understanding is correct, the appeal would be that I can't be fined under a code noting "parked without payment of parking charge" due to the fact there's no charge, right?


7
Hello,


My wife recently visited the Lloyd Park Car Park in Croydon and totally forgot to use Ringgo to 'pay' for the 3 hours free parking. When she came back to the car, she had a Penalty Charge Notice issued with code 73 'parked without payment of the parking charge'. As she was staying longer for food at the café, she got worried she could get a second one so immediately registered the parking on Ringgo (at 12:33), PCN was issued at 11:46.


See images below:


Front:



Back:



Obviously we did not pay the free parking charge on time, but what I was wondering is whether there's any grounds to appeal due to the observation time being only a single minute? I searched online a bit and it does seem that in most cases it should be at least 2 minutes if I'm understanding correctly, but I am not 100% sure. Any help would be greatly appreciated!


Thanks.

8
I see, thank you. That is correct the PCN is in the name of the lessee (i.e. the LTD).

I guess their only option would be to check with the lease company when that acceptance letter was received, but not sure they will be willing to do this instead of paying the discounted rate.

Thanks a lot for your help :)

9
Quote
They have 28 days to issue a PCN from contravention date, so this looks way over, but is the car leased ? If so, the first PCN goes to the lease company, who can pass on details of the lessee, and get the PCN cancelled. The council then have another 28 days to issue a second PCN.
Thanks! Confirming the car is leased. It's a company car (the company is a Ltd company owned by my relative), so the PCN was sent to 'xxx LTD' if that matters.

Agreed re. the signs and the offence, I think except if they can use the 28 days technicality, they are out of luck. In this case, would you recommend they write to the council to check whether they first reached out to the leasing company?

Thanks!

10


Hello!

Some family member recently visited and got lost on their way to my place; they entered a road which is limited to pedestrians during certain hours on certain days (except permit holders).

They received the below PCN:

https://imgur.com/a/wPcY6Wu

The location is here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/NvAGEoXjuDCbRRv99

And I was able to confirm that they were indeed on a road they shouldn't have a that time, as I could see on this sign on street view:

https://imgur.com/a/PoFiYyi

It seems that the offence itself happened and my relative just didn't notice. However, what I'm wondering about (but I'm confused by seemingly contradictory information I find online) is that PCN was issued well over 28 days late (24.10 issued, received through letterbox on 28.10 for an offence on 13.09). Is that something they can challenge on that basis?

I'll try to get better quality picture of the PCN ASAP!

Thanks a lot for any help!

Pages: [1]