Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Mome Rath

Pages: [1]
1
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Legal Charge on a Property
« on: March 28, 2025, 12:36:19 pm »
Thanks guys, this is all most helpful.  I can see now that both myself and my friend have approached this the wrong way.  In particular, failure to consider the cost of setting up an apparently simple loan. My friend first asked the conveyancing solicitor, who said they couldn't act due to conflict of interest.  So he got another solicitor to prepare the CH1.  It now transpires that I should have instructed the other solicitor.

I was hoping for some information about what I should expect to see on a CH1.  and what to look out for that could make it not valid.  To my non-legal eye the form looks straight forward and all the names, addresses, full title guarantee, amount loaned, interest etc. all seem to be correct.  I am lending to a trusted friend I have known for approx. 40 years.  I consider the risk of him deliberately defaulting is very low.  He is purchasing a residential property in his own name and will be living there.  He is not a business or company.  There is one other loan from another mutual friend.  There is no other mortgage.

I am wondering now if having a 'charge on the property' gives me any useful legal rights in the real world if I have to guess whether a court would grant a possession order.  My loan is approx. 10% of the current property value.

2
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Legal Charge on a Property
« on: March 27, 2025, 01:25:36 pm »
The charge is on the property being purchased by my friend, not on my property.  It is to secure my loan and the loan from another friend.  My understanding is that it allows me to recover my money in case my friend doesn't pay back the loan for whatever reason or circumstance.  Is that the correct interpretation?

**Oops, my bad - shouldn't have skim-read - Andy

3
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Legal Charge on a Property
« on: March 27, 2025, 10:08:51 am »
The friend I am lending the money to engaged a different solicitor (not the one doing the conveyancing) to draw up an agreement between the three parties. The CH1 was the result.

4
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Legal Charge on a Property
« on: March 27, 2025, 09:08:47 am »
Thanks.  So the CH1 being completed by a qualified solicitor is not sufficient guarantee? 

5
Non-motoring legal advice / Legal Charge on a Property
« on: March 26, 2025, 06:20:57 pm »
Hello, I'm seeking some advice please about Land Registry form CH1.

I have agreed to lend some money to a friend to help fund a property purchase.  He is to pay me interest, a bit more than I am getting on the capital at present, and I am to have a legal charge on the property until the loan is paid off.  Another friend is doing the same so we will both have a charge on the property, which is about 10% of the property value.  I have been presented with a completed form CH1 which he got a solicitor to complete.  This is a different solicitor from the conveyancing solicitor.  However, the conveyancing solicitor says I need to get independent legal advise before the form is registered (a third solicitor).  My problem is the cost of that advise will make the loan unviable - it will cost me more than the extra interest I would get. The conveyancing solicitor implied that legal advice was a requirement for the agreement to be valid.  Is that correct?  The property is worth a lot more than both our loans, so my feeling is that the money should be safe. I am just doing this to help out a friend, not to make the maximum amount of money.

What do I need to look out for on a CH1 agreement?

Thanks   

6
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Boundary Wall
« on: November 05, 2024, 03:31:16 pm »
It's a tricky situation.  I agree that Mum shouldn't have to pay anything.  However, she is itching to pay for fear of upsetting the neighbours. I keep pointing out to her that she has not yet had the wall reinstated with the existing antique bricks as she wanted.  The only reason I can see for the revised 50/25/25% split is that is the approximate boundary length for each property.  The original 33.3% split was from the initial informal meeting and is not documented.  We are happy to honour the original agreement, but the change was decided by the landlord neighbour and not discussed. 

Another consideration is that Mum is 95 and we may need to sell the house soon to pay for a care home.  I understand that any neighbour disputes are now documented in the sales pack.  This may be one of those cases where a party wall surveyor would have been useful.  However, I presume it's too late now that most of the evidence has been cleared away?

7
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Boundary Wall
« on: November 04, 2024, 10:30:09 am »
Thanks,  I did check the house insurance. Sadly legal expenses not covered.

8
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Boundary Wall
« on: November 02, 2024, 03:30:17 pm »
No such luck I'm afraid.  My late Father bought the property in the 1950's. There is a file full of papers along with the deeds, but I couldn't find anything about which wall belongs to which property.  We took the pragmatic view that it was shared equally in order to avoid an argument.  But it seems this has not helped.

9
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Boundary Wall
« on: October 31, 2024, 06:07:00 pm »
Hi Mick,

Agreed, but we don't know which party owns the original wall.  I did look through the Victorian deeds, but could find nothing useful regarding this.  How  could we find out?  The wall was not in the best condition, although it was definitely the tree roots which forced it over. This is why we thought a three way split between the parties would be the fairest approach.  However, the neighbour responsible for the tree is not playing ball. 

10
Non-motoring legal advice / Boundary Wall
« on: October 31, 2024, 03:41:38 pm »
Hello, I am seeking advice please on the best way to proceed regarding a garden wall problem involving three neighbours.

My elderly Mother's house backs onto two other properties (the spacing between the houses is staggered).  The other gardens are approx. 1m higher.  There is a  brick retaining wall along the whole length of the boundary.  On my Mother's side the wall is approx 2m high.  In one of the other gardens is a large tree close to the boundary of all three gardens.  My Mother has a small patio area with table and chairs by the wall.

During Spring 2023, the neighbour cut back the tree to just above the top of the wall.  However the tree thrived, putting out vociferous growth and during Summer 2023 the entire length of wall collapsed into my Mothers garden.  By good fortune there was a cool breeze that day and my Mother was not sitting on the patio.  Her chair was crushed to matchwood.

We cleared the area and most of the bricks could be salvaged for reuse.  The insurance company advised that the damage was not covered.  At an informal meeting with the neighbours we agreed to split the repair costs equally between the three parties.  My Mother made it clear that she wanted it rebuilt using the original bricks to be in keeping with the other garden walls.  The neighbour with the tree wanted to rebuild with concrete blocks for cheapness.  So we compromised on a composite wall with concrete blocks on the neighbours side and bricks on my Mother's side.  The neighbour with the tree was to remove it and properly grind out the stump to enable the wall footing to be rebuilt. They wanted to use their own builders for the wall.

The neighbour with the tree is a landlord who manages multiple properties. They don't live there. It subsequently proved difficult to get any progress on the tree removal. I eventually obtained a quote this Summer 2024 for rebuilding the wall and footings.  The bricklayer expressed reluctance to get involved due to three separate parties, and the quote was high.  However I forwarded this to the neighbours for comment.  The next weekend, workmen for the landlord neighbour turned up and completely removed the tree stump and roots.  A few weeks later, the landlord and a bricklayer showed up.  They dug out the footings, poured in concrete and rebuilt the wall with concrete blocks up to approx 1.5m. They did a good professional job. However, they gave no indication that they would complete the job by facing with the original bricks on my Mother's side. 

The landlord neighbour is now demanding that we pay half the cost  immediately and being vey pushy. (Not a third as originally discussed. The other neighbour says he was asked to pay a quarter).

My concern is that the neighbour has changed the original agreement and done the work the way they wanted without further discussion.  Whilst we are happy to make an interim payment now, I am not confident that the job will be completed now that the retaining wall is in place. So we will be faced with the full cost of the brickwork. It seems reasonable that we contribute towards a new wall, but this expense was only needed due to the neighbours unmanaged tree.

I don't want to antagonise the neighbours, but I also want a satisfactory outcome for my Mother who enjoys gardening.  What would you guys recommend?

Thanks,

   


           

11
Non-motoring legal advice / Re: Car Insurance
« on: October 16, 2024, 12:51:06 pm »
Thanks for your help. That's useful to know.

12
Non-motoring legal advice / Car Insurance
« on: October 15, 2024, 03:17:29 pm »
Hello, I hope you can help with my question about motor insurance please.  My partner is a named driver on my car policy.  It was just for emergency use as she was not keen on driving and rarely did.  Sadly she has now passed away.  The insurance company will charge a fee to make a mid term change to the policy. So my question is, am I legally required to remove her name from the policy if I am the main driver?  Or is it OK to wait until normal renewal time?

Thanks.

Pages: [1]