Free Traffic Legal Advice

Initial observation at 13.28 valve positions would have been noted on CEOs hand held computer and once inputted they can not be changed, and on second observation if the valve positions are the same a pcn would be issued as in your case.
Photos are only taken of cars after the issue of a pcn .
A ceo may log in lots of observations and if they took a photo of every one the memory of their HHC would use up very quickly so that is why photos are only taken at time of issue.

If ticket expired 08.30 then the 10 minute grace period would be until 08.40 so the CEO could issue a pcn at 08.40 and 1 second, but most CEOs would wait until 08.41 .
My council who I worked for gave instructions to give the extra minute but legally we didn’t have to , but when I was doing the job it was only 5 minutes grace period not 10.

The CEO can’t invent a start time for observations .
Once he inputs your VRM and valve positions into his or her hand held computer it registers time so it can’t be changed to suit him at a later time .
So the CEO cannot lie about start of observation

Thank you.  I am still a bit confused as to why my car was the only one with a ticket.

Is this worth contesting?

It could be that the other vehicles parked up after yours was ticketed.

The old argument about if it public or private.
If members of the public have access to walk across the land where your bike is parked the council can give you a pcn, but if it was fenced or posts with a chain it is classed as private land .
A case in my local area which went to the traffic penalty tribunal was decided in favour of the council.
The appelent used to park his bike on the pavement outside his house and he produced land registry documents to show his cellar went under the pavement so he was actually parked on top of his cellar (his land ) but the adjudicator came to the judgement that even though he owned the cellar under the pavement, the council maintained and the public had access to walk across the land .

It’s not your disabled bay , it was put there for your use but any blue badge holder can use the bay not only you .
Outside homes there can be two different types of disabled bay, one that doesn’t have a TMO or an upright sign this is classed as a courtesy bay and can not be enforced.
And the second type has a TMO and sign this can be enforced by a ceo.
If first type the pcn is not enforceable, the second type with a sign a pcn can be issued if a blue badge is not displayed.
Just having a blue badge is not enough , the contravention is for not displaying a valid badge

Just a thought.
Prevented from serving a Pcn can come in different forms , either driving away before Pcn was fully prepared,  or the driver or passenger was threatening the CEO so he felt unsafe to carry on issuing the Pcn at that time.
The only way to clarify the circumstances is to see the CEOs notes to explain why a Pcn was not issued at the time.

Surely that signage doesn’t state it’s a taxi rank but a no waiting restriction after 6pm to 8am so an 01 not a 45 contravention would be appropriate and only with an accompanying yellow line.
If the main taxi rank is close by this space could be used as a feeder to main rank but once again not marked correctly as a taxi rank or even without yellow line an 01 contravention could not be enforced unless a restricted parking zone.