1
Speeding and other criminal offences / Re: Speeding, police don’t believe details, unsure of driver
« on: September 16, 2024, 04:30:58 pm »
Apologies, see below answers to your questions in red.
Did your sister reply to the initial NIP with your (correct) details? Or was she more vague about it, e.g. someone else's details?
Yes, she replied with my details, they were correct. My address has not changed in 38 years, my name has never changed. She did not have my driving license number.
Did you subsequently get your own S.172 request and reply to it? (You said in your first post "something might be wrong with the details I provided or something else," suggesting you did. Yet you next post says "I did not know of the NIP until this second letter arrived." Some consistency would help.)
No, I have not received a S.172, my sister filled in the first S.172 and sent it back to them, she did not tell me about it. When she received the second one with the accompanying letter saying they believe the details to be incorrect she came to me with letter concerned.
So, what exactly did you reply with? Did you unequivocally name either yourself or the mechanic?
She did not know the mechanics details so named me. I think her thought was I would get a letter and name the mechanic myself.
Did your sister reply to the initial NIP with your (correct) details? Or was she more vague about it, e.g. someone else's details?
Yes, she replied with my details, they were correct. My address has not changed in 38 years, my name has never changed. She did not have my driving license number.
Did you subsequently get your own S.172 request and reply to it? (You said in your first post "something might be wrong with the details I provided or something else," suggesting you did. Yet you next post says "I did not know of the NIP until this second letter arrived." Some consistency would help.)
No, I have not received a S.172, my sister filled in the first S.172 and sent it back to them, she did not tell me about it. When she received the second one with the accompanying letter saying they believe the details to be incorrect she came to me with letter concerned.
So, what exactly did you reply with? Did you unequivocally name either yourself or the mechanic?
She did not know the mechanics details so named me. I think her thought was I would get a letter and name the mechanic myself.
Let's get this right.
Did your sister reply to the initial NIP with your (correct) details? Or was she more vague about it, e.g. someone else's details?
Did you subsequently get your own S.172 request and reply to it? (You said in your first post "something might be wrong with the details I provided or something else," suggesting you did. Yet you next post says "I did not know of the NIP until this second letter arrived." Some consistency would help.)
So, what exactly did you reply with? Did you unequivocally name either yourself or the mechanic?
Seems it's taken best part of 4 months for the police to investigate whatever they were told. Be good to know what they were told and by whom.