1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 30, 2024, 04:12:05 pm »
Thank you @cp8759. PM sent.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 26, 2024, 06:16:31 pm »
So do you think it is not worth appealing pursuing this one anymore?
3
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 24, 2024, 04:29:32 pm »
If it doesnt go up further at this point it may be worth an appeal. What do you guys think?
4
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 24, 2024, 08:58:07 am »
Will the charge remain at £160 if i appeal to the adjudicator and lose?
5
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 22, 2024, 05:53:23 pm »6
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 22, 2024, 02:31:36 pm »
Yes, I was thinking more on the fact that they seem to have messed up their response (doesn't make sense) in the NOR, if that has any grounds.
7
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Appeal rejection TFL 32d 'failing to drive in direction shown by arrow' Lansdowne Way
« on: May 22, 2024, 12:31:34 pm »
Received a PCN from TFL for allegedly 'failing to drive in the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign' at Lansdowne way JW A3 Clapham Rd.
As I didn't see a white arrow on a blue sign and the photos supplied by TFL don't show the sign, I requested the video evidence to confirm this contravention.
After analysing the video evidence, this also failed to show the arrow on a blue sign.
Therefore I decided to appeal on the grounds of 'no contravention occurred' and stating along the lines of "after analysing the photographic and video evidence supplied by TFL, the camera angle of the alleged contravention is such that the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign is not visible. Therefore there is no proof that at the relevant time and date the sign was visible.
Unfortunately I don't have a copy of my representation as i sent it online and forgot to save it.
Most recently I received a Notice of Rejection (08/05/24) saying "In your representation you have stated that the camera angle direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign is not visible in any of the evidence supplied."
This does not make sense and it seems like they have messed up their wording as this was not what I stated in my appeal.
Do you believe I have a strong enough argument to take it to the adjudicator?
I have attached the original PCN and NOR. I will try to add the video later if you deem it necessary as I was unable to upload it.
https://imgur.com/a/huGJ1MT
As I didn't see a white arrow on a blue sign and the photos supplied by TFL don't show the sign, I requested the video evidence to confirm this contravention.
After analysing the video evidence, this also failed to show the arrow on a blue sign.
Therefore I decided to appeal on the grounds of 'no contravention occurred' and stating along the lines of "after analysing the photographic and video evidence supplied by TFL, the camera angle of the alleged contravention is such that the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign is not visible. Therefore there is no proof that at the relevant time and date the sign was visible.
Unfortunately I don't have a copy of my representation as i sent it online and forgot to save it.
Most recently I received a Notice of Rejection (08/05/24) saying "In your representation you have stated that the camera angle direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign is not visible in any of the evidence supplied."
This does not make sense and it seems like they have messed up their wording as this was not what I stated in my appeal.
Do you believe I have a strong enough argument to take it to the adjudicator?
I have attached the original PCN and NOR. I will try to add the video later if you deem it necessary as I was unable to upload it.
https://imgur.com/a/huGJ1MT
8
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / TFL Yellow Box fine Oval Stn
« on: July 18, 2023, 12:11:12 am »Hello everyone, just want to get your views and opinions.
My dad works for a school meal delivery company and he received a letter from the company he works for on friday 14th July regarding a yellow box PCN at the Oval station junction. He told me that he was on his normal run travelling in the direction of camberwell new road towards the cricket ground but as he crossed the junction the traffic lights next to the station turned red and so he was left with the back of his van over the yellow box.
The incident occurred on the 30/06/23 the company received the notice on 05/07/23 and only notified him on the 14th as can be seen from the letter in the link.
When i looked at the contavention evidence on TFLs website there are only 3 photos but no video.
Also I noticed that the PCN has already been paid by the company but they have given him 3 working days to appeal the letter he received from them.
They have done this a few times in the past to my dad, and i thought that this time i would not let them get away with it that easily as they didn't t even consider the fact that he is retiring at the end of this week.
So if you guys think there is any way i could tackle this i would value your advice.
https://imgur.com/a/9B6VA5S
Pages: [1]