Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sadaboutcars

Pages: [1] 2
1
It's not clear to me whether my car was removed because I was classed as a persistent evader (which I was but I am not) or if it's because it was removed for "persistent unlawful parking" which is what it seems to suggest in this letter.

2
Post the rejection in full.

Ok I have uploaded it here. See the page with the pink highlights and the reverse of that.
https://imgur.com/a/sJBOU5O

4
Hi All,

Just wanted to let you know that I received a rejection letter to my representation.
One of the points I argued was that the council did not send a reminder to renew my permit. The rejection letter states that: "Having checked the permit record, I can see a reminder letter was set up automatically, however, it appears the system did not generate the renewal reminder letter to send out."

I have a date at the tribunal in which I will be using this statement as evidence for my case. Any further advice would be welcome.

5
From what I understand once I make formal reps I then risk paying the non-discounted rate for all the tickets. That's what I'm worried about if my case is not strong enough.

6
Thanks for this, do you know if their argument would hold up at a tribunal? Still unsure whether I should risk taking this all the way.

7
Not sure if anyone is still reading this... but here is my challenge for the remaining PCN's I will then write a third version when it comes to challenging the impound PCN and towing fees. Let me know if I can improve on this as I have only submitted challenges now for 2 out of 6 PCN's:



Dear Sir/ Madam,

I am writing to formally challenge the above Penalty Charge Notice.

These are the three main reasons for my challenge:

1. The penalties as a whole including the towing fees far exceeds what is just, this should be treated as a continuous contravention (details below)*
2. Major discrepancy in the sequence of PCN numbers (details below)**
3. I ask kindly for discretion due to an oversight in not renewing, as I did not get a reminder (details below)***


*REASON 1*

The penalty charge exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case; In respect of each PCN other than the first the argument of 'continuous contravention' may be advanced. I find that one continuous contravention has occurred; the vehicle remains at the
same location throughout the period these Penalty Charge Notices were issued. There is no rule of law or regulation that entitles an authority to issue a penalty charge notice every 24 hours. Therefore I am challenging all the PCN’s issued to me for the same offence, one of which I have paid already to remove my car from IMPOUND:

TT57609862 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 23/07/2024 Collingwood Street,
TT57633379 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 25/07/2024 Collingwood Street,
TT57610271 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 26/07/2024 Collingwood Street,
TT57633550 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 29/07/2024 Collingwood Street,
TT57636242 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 30/07/2024 Collingwood Street,
TT57666935 £0.00 SHD484X Issued 31/07/2024 Collingwood Street (impound PCN, paid)

**REASON 2**

This PCN dated the 25/072024 has a major discrepancy with the ticket number. If you look at the PCN numbers across the series of six PCN’s you will see that the PCN number for the 25th appears to be issued on the 29th. All the other PCN’s are in ascending numerical order, but the ticket number on the 25th is higher than the ticket number on the 26th (when it should be lower) and very similar to the ticket number on the 29th, as if they were given on the same day. I therefore believe this ticket has been issued fraudulently and represents a very serious breach of CEO protocol. I therefore believe that this ticket and all others should be canceled due to the potentially scandalous nature of the CEO’s offence.

TT57609862 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 23/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633379 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 25/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57610271 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 26/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633550 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 29/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57636242 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 30/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57666935 £0.00 SHD484X Issued 31/07/2024 Collingwood Street (impound PCN, paid)



***REASON 3***
I have been a resident of Tower Hamlets for six years now. For each year that I have held a residential parking permit, I receive a reminder to renew my residents permit. This year I did NOT receive a reminder. I have attached a screen-shot showing all the previous saved reminders in my inbox, along with the dates for each of them. As you will see here, there is no reminder for 2024, the year in which my latest resident parking permit expired.

I have received a reminder in all previous years without fail, since June 2021. Because of this, the council has  established a precedent for renewal of permits. A change in this precedent is what has caused my failure to renew the permit on time.  As I have not been notified of a change in procedure, I assume this to be a technical error, in which case a technical error on behalf of the council should not be grounds for penalising a resident.

For avoidance of doubt, I have logged into my account on "towerhamlets.tarantopermits.com" and verified that my account details show the correct email address. As the correct email address is listed there, there should be no reason that I did not receive a reminder, except that of a technical nature with the council's systems.

As the council failed to notify me that the permit was to be renewed and the attendant conditions e.g. cost, instructions and links for renewal etc... something which was established custom and practice for at least the past four years, I believe this PCN should be canceled.

From a legal standpoint: When someone as myself applies for a permit they enter into an agreement with the council, an agreement which in this instance was breached by the council. It doesn't matter whether this agreement states that the council will notify you, custom and practice (which may be taken to form part of the contract) is that you have in the past notified me on every occasion.  It therefore follows that I should not be penalised for the council's failure to uphold this well established agreement.


Sincerely,
XXX

8
I don't know what time it was removed, I didn't even realise it was gone until the next day.

The documentation should tell you because otherwise how would you know the following:

until the appropriate period has elapsed since the giving of that penalty charge notice in respect of the contravention.

(4) In this regulation—

“the appropriate period” means—
(a)
in the case of a vehicle as respects which there are 3 or more penalty charges outstanding, 15 minutes;

(b)
in any other case 30 minutes;



Update, the PCN time was 10:41, the towing time was 14:32 so it looks like I won't be able to argue this point.

In short, if they removed before 30 minutes had elapsed then this is a procedural impropriety unless 3 or more PCNs etc. etc.

And how would you know unless the time of removal is in evidence?

9
Here is my first attempt at a challenge for the oldest of the PCN's. For the remaining PCN's I will have more points to argue and not just the failure to remind me bit. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this so far. Any feedback on the below would be appreciated as I have five more of these to write.:

Dear Sir/ Madam,

I am writing to formally challenge the above Penalty Charge Notice.

I have been a resident of Tower Hamlets for six years now. For each year that I have held a residential parking permit, I receive a reminder to renew my residents permit. This year I did NOT receive a reminder. I have attached a screen-shot showing all the previous saved reminders in my inbox, along with the dates for each of them. As you will see here, there is no reminder for 2024, the year in which my latest resident parking permit expired.

I have received a reminder in all previous years without fail, since June 2021. Because of this, the council has  established a precedent for renewal of permits. A change in this precedent is what has caused my failure to renew the permit on time.  As I have not been notified of a change in procedure, I assume this to be a technical error, in which case a technical error on behalf of the council should not be grounds for penalising a resident.

For avoidance of doubt, I have logged into my account on "towerhamlets.tarantopermits.com" and verified that my account details show the correct email address. As the correct email address is listed there, there should be no reason that I did not receive a reminder, except that of a technical nature with the council's systems.

As the council failed to notify me that the permit was to be renewed and the attendant conditions e.g. cost, instructions and links for renewal etc... something which was established custom and practice for at least the past four years, I believe this PCN should be canceled.

From a legal standpoint: When someone as myself applies for a permit they enter into an agreement with the council, an agreement which in this instance was breached by the council. It doesn't matter whether this agreement states that the council will notify you, custom and practice (which may be taken to form part of the contract) is that you have in the past notified me on every occasion.  It therefore follows that I should not be penalised for the council's failure to uphold this well established agreement.

Sincerely,
XXXX


10
Actually if I look up the PCN online and see the photos from the enforcer, you can actually see the tow hooks behind the wheel in one of the photos...

EDIT although it had more than three PCN's at that time so is this irrelevant?

11
I don't know what time it was removed, I didn't even realise it was gone until the next day.

If they have legal basis under the secondary priority then won't they just go with that basis as justification?

12
Thank you, I have added the back of the impound PCN on the same link: https://imgur.com/a/sJBOU5O

Still wondering if anyone has any thoughts on why the number PCN for the 25th has a higher ticket number than the one on the 26th:

TT57609862 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 23/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633379 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 25/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57610271 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 26/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633550 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 29/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57636242 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 30/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57666935 £0.00 SHD484X Issued 31/07/2024 Collingwood Street (impound PCN, paid)

13
Hi H C Andersen,

Thanks for your thoughts and for looking into this.

Is this link still not working for you? The impound docs are here:

https://imgur.com/a/sJBOU5O (if not working in safari try another browser. Works for me on Chrome and Tor)


Also, did you see the drive folder that stamfordman posted, it seems to outline the Tower Hamlets policy for removals in the doc titled Policy - Vehicle Removals and Relocations V4:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13NkOAkg8CDLQtYAj9Z5KP5lwv4y-9hWW

But if I understand your last reply correctly, this policy won't hold up in court if it does not "'have regard to' the Secretary of State's Statutory Guidance"?


14
Thanks for the link stamfordman! That's a lot to go through but at a glance I can already see some useful info.

Do you have any thoughts on the sequence of the PCN numbers? It almost looks to me like the enforcement officer issued me two tickets on the 29th?

I'm not sure if they did actually notice my permit had expired earlier as when it happened last time I got ticketed right away. They are probably just used to seeing my car always in the same spot and didn't bother scanning it for a couple weeks.

15
Hi Again,

I need to submit my first challenges today or tomorrow, any last tips for that?

Also did anyone else find the ticked number of the one issued on the 25th suspicious?

Looking at the PCN numbers in order, the 25th seems out of sequence, as if it was issued on the 29th?:

TT57609862 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 23/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633379 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 25/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57610271 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 26/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57633550 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 29/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57636242 £65.00 SHD484X Issued 30/07/2024 Collingwood Street
TT57666935 £0.00 SHD484X Issued 31/07/2024 Collingwood Street (impound PCN, paid)

Pages: [1] 2