Free Traffic Legal Advice

I have received the following which I am extremely annoyed about.

As shown in the PCN photos there was a long queue of cars in the right hand lane during rush hour, and there was a queue after the traffic lights also filling the left lane. Since I saw the "END OF BUS LANE" sign I falsely believed I could safely move over a few cars before the sign so as not to block the right hand lane while waiting in hope that someone would let me into the left lane. The video also captures me indicating and moving into the lane at the last minute showing that I was using the correct lane the rest of the time.

All common sense driving to get in your lane at a suitable time and not try to cut into traffic but this camera is clearly designed to extort that. 

GSV link

I have received the following which I am extremely annoyed about.

As shown in the PCN photos there was a long queue of cars in the right hand lane during rush hour, and there was a queue after the traffic lights also filling the left lane. Since I saw the "END OF BUS LANE" sign I falsely believed I could safely move over a few cars before the sign so as not to block the right hand lane while waiting in hope that someone would left me into the left lane. The video also captures me indicating and moving into the lane at the last minute showing that I was using the correct lane the rest of the time.

All common sense driving to get in your lane at a suitable time and not try to cut into traffic but this camera is clearly designed to extort that. 

GSV link

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Then how did the driver get there without observing the contextual road markings? And 'I've seen vehicles there a few times too so I was satisfied it was permitted.' would suggest you know the area.

You're free to make reps and pursue your legal rights(if you are the keeper) to adjudication. Your choice.

I'm simply giving you what I believe would be the council's view and that of an adjudicator.

Your argument is that you were parked on the carriageway with no markings to indicate a restriction. I put it this way because if you knew that you were not on the carriageway but the footway instead then as you are expected to know that markings may only be placed at the edge of the carriageway you were obliged to look for the edge of the carriageway, even if beyond a dwarf wall.

I explained in my very first post.. "placed in such a way the driver would never see it on entry or exit to the area."
I certainly didn't see them when I drove in at the side with the wall obscuring the view and it was during darkness. There are also two trees on the left side now which aren't shown on the street view.
There is enough space to park a car on the other side of the wall where the markings and signage are in place so it isn't reasonable any average person would assume them to also apply to behind the wall as well.

I would certainly like to make reps but I'm not yet sure what I should be saying.

Sheffield council have confirmed the entire area up to the buildings edge is adopted and part of the highway.
I'm not sure where to go with this now, it seems ambiguously unfair to an average road user to know this from a sign facing over a wall area which vehicles could also reasonably park.

By breach of regs I meant more that the council is applying them creatively in the context of that sign.
I'd be grateful if a few more veterans could chip in since at the moment there is 1 yes and 1 no regarding whether it applies to where the vehicle was parked
Thanks

I can't, Google didn't even survey the road past that area for some reason which is why I had to use Bing street view instead for the image.
I am parked in the top right corner by the black door as you can sort of see from the small council image, if you mean the two short yellow lines marked vertically all along the area, no there aren't any.

This is the bing view link

Thanks

I was gone for 30 minutes or so, I'm not sure there is really anything I can claim?
Thanks