Free Traffic Legal Advice

thanks for your replies. They were definitely automatically attached (I screenshotted the whole process) , but yes, I could have pressed the remove buttons. However I considered that any deviation from their workflow would be used as an excuse not to process it.

Thanks for your reply

I have sent email to the General Manager at the Colchester store, and to customer services also. I haven't had a reply as yet . (There isnt a CEO)

I am a bit concerned as the 28 day appeal period will be up tomorrow. These things only get more intractable with time in my previous experience. Its a bit tricky as I am out of the country and the wifi is sporadic so I am trying to deal with this.

Apparently according to the back of the Parkingeye notice, they have some ability whereby after 28 days if I havent given the name of the driver, they can just make me pay anyway. I dont know how they get these powers ?! I'll pay the council at a push for a yellow line, but these guys just seem to be on a scam gravy train.

Is there any sense in me sending in fairly generic appeal , (until I get more advice), in order that at least the process is halted in the meantime? ALso I seem to remember with a previous one involving Tesco , it was solved by sending them "you dont know the driver " type text, and they relented? Will it work here? ( I have the text)

Best regards

OK due to time constraints I decided to bite the bullet and pay. It being too long after the Issue date of the notice . The full charge is £50

I went to the website to pay, but strangely it offered me the reduced charge of £30 even though it is possible that I was not within the reduced penalty period.

I  have paid this £30 and got the receipt. I notice that it does not say that the Notice is now "satisfied" or anything like that, merely that I have paid £30.
Should I regard this as completely satisfied, regardless of the charge amount stated on the notice and the stipulated dates for reduced charge?

Best regards

Thanks for your reply

In the first instance I am posting here to see if anyone has any knowledge of procedural errors or technical errors in their claim before I decide to go ahead or not

In the past I had the same issue with Horizon and successfully appealed on the first direct appeal to them  (thanks to members of this group and the old group)

Regards