1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Camden Council PCN, Using restricted route, Vernon Place WC1
« on: August 26, 2025, 07:11:27 pm »
Would this appeal to the adjudicator be appropriate and to the point?
The PCN alleges “using a route restricted to certain vehicles (local buses)”. However, the video evidence shows that:
I was travelling in the opposite direction to the bus lane in question, which operates as a contraflow lane.
I did not enter or use that lane as a through-route. At most, my wheels briefly crossed the line by no more than a foot, and for less than a second, solely to pass a stationary vehicle .
Any restriction signage applies to traffic entering the bus lane in the permitted direction. From my direction of travel, the signs were not visible or applicable. It is therefore not possible to contravene signage that is facing the other way.
On this basis, I submit that the contravention “using a route restricted to certain vehicles” is incorrectly applied to this situation and did not occur.
The PCN alleges “using a route restricted to certain vehicles (local buses)”. However, the video evidence shows that:
I was travelling in the opposite direction to the bus lane in question, which operates as a contraflow lane.
I did not enter or use that lane as a through-route. At most, my wheels briefly crossed the line by no more than a foot, and for less than a second, solely to pass a stationary vehicle .
Any restriction signage applies to traffic entering the bus lane in the permitted direction. From my direction of travel, the signs were not visible or applicable. It is therefore not possible to contravene signage that is facing the other way.
On this basis, I submit that the contravention “using a route restricted to certain vehicles” is incorrectly applied to this situation and did not occur.