Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - almep13

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Good morning Stamfordman,

Thank you for letting me know.

Have a nice day ahead.

Kind regards,

Almep13

2
Thanks Tincombe.

I'll focus on the DKB.

Kind regards,

Almep13

3
Hi Tincombe,

it's not access to Canham Mews, the electric gate is for access to Factory Quarter.

However, lack of DKB or visible DBK is an important factor in establishing if a contravention took place or not.

I'll draft an appeal and place it here for comments.

Thanks and regards,

Almep13

4
Good morning Tincombe,

The BB holder was on its own and wanted to get through the gate to the residential parking. As the gate was indicated as "malfunctioning" considering the red/white stripes ribbon, the BB holder stopped the car where the alleged contravention took place to assess the gate. The BB holder didn't see the warden/ CEO as the car would have been behind the back of the BB holder assessing the gate.

The BB holder genuinely believed that someone in its position may park there for up to three hours (max limit for parking on DBL) as no restrictions are indicated and other BB holders tend to park time to time in that spot.

The BB holder was probably away from the car for 5-10 min. But the time indicator was shown as 10:30am and the PCN was issued at 10:31am. It seems that while the BB holder was assessing the gate and unaware what was going on behind its back, the CEO issued the PCN. It seems like the CEO has taken max two minutes to take pictures and issue the PCN.

Here are links to the front and back side of the PCN attached to the screen of the car.

https://imgpile.com/p/Rd06rqd#tEUYT9A - front side
https://imgpile.com/p/Rd06rqd#uweJUeY - back side

Thank you and kind regards,

Almep13


 

5
Good evening Incandescent, Hippocrates, Tincombe, Stamfordman and others.

I hope you are all well and thank you so much for your views, I really appreciate.

My representation was mainly on the three points below, which can also be found on the attached links:
i) No contravention occurred;
ii) (Lack of) Restrictions on Canham Road based on list of restrictions across Ealing Borough as per its website.
iii) Unfair treatment of Blue Badge holders.

https://imgpile.com/p/bSdRplK#TwB9UKx - first part of the representation
https://imgpile.com/p/bSdRplK#4tCoZrx - 2nd part

For completeness I'm also attaching on the same post their initial decline and then the second decline following my email to Ealing Parking Services that there are no visible restrictions on Canham Road.

https://imgpile.com/p/rJWJ1SC#OuIvUI0 - first decline letter

https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#8c0MJLL - 2nd decline letter, part 1

https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#Bit7Z0c - 2nd decline letter, part 2

Thank you and have a good night.

Kind regards,

Almep13

   

6
Good evening,

I hope you are all well and enjoying the weather.

I have just received this morning the Notice to Owner (NtO) as per links below.

I believe the two grounds of appeal would be: i) no contravention occurred (no restrictions in place and BB permit displayed); and ii) procedural impropriety (Council shouldn't have issued a PCN and continue to pursue payment as point (i) did not occur.

Is there any other points / impropriety that you can spot from the NtO attached?

https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#ucZwAtN   (page 1)
https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#plDCcn1   (page 2)
https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#sxYEatU   (page 3)
https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#XRUVt8y   (page 4)
https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#sCLiBlQ   (page 5)
https://imgpile.com/p/0Uihp76#GhEOVxi   (page 6)

Thank you in advance for your views.

Kind regards,

Almep13

7
Good evening,

I hope the hot weather is somehow bearable.

I wrote an email to Ealing Parking Services questioning their decision and claim of double stripes on the kerb.

They responded iterating the same claim. I attach the pictures of the latest response.

I'm letting it pass by until they issue Notice to the Keeper.

Thank you for your views and take care of yourselves.

https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#8c0MJLL

https://imgpile.com/p/yfns4Xo#Bit7Z0c

Kind regards,

Alemp13

8
Good evening Stamfordman,

thank you for the advice.

Yes, logbook is updated with name and address, thanks.

Kind regards,

Almep13

9
Good evening,

I hope you are well.

I challenged the PCN and they emailed yesterday with the decision to reject the appeal.

I attach their response for your attention.

They refer to yellow stripes and white "No loading" signs, but I can't see any of them from the pictures they have taken.

Are there any other grounds I can use? What's your view of the chances of a successful appeal at London Tribunals?

https://imgpile.com/p/rJWJ1SC#OuIvUI0

Thank you in advance for your opinions.

Thanks and regards,

Almep13

10
Good evening Stamfordman and Incandescent,

That is my view too - no sign and no double blips to indicate contravention 02 for loading/ uploading in restricted area.

Thank you for your views, I appreciate it.

Kind regards,

Almep13

11
Dear Forum members,

I hope you are well.

The driver, a Blue Badge holder, parked on double yellow line in Canham Rd, W3 (Ealing borough) believing not to be any restrictions for loading/ unloading as there are no signposts or any kerb signs indicating such restrictions.

Looking at the time indicated in the BB and pictures taken by the traffic warden, it seems that the warden had issued the PCN within very brief moment the car being parked (10:30am to 10:31am).

I include the following:
PCN ref - AO09495858;
VRN - LV68UTB;
and the link below so that pictures taken by the warden can inform your views of potential appeal grounds.

https://ealing.tarantoportal.com/PCN

My personal view is that Councils and their subcontractors issue such PCNs hoping and knowing that not many would appeal and even if those who appeal, some will be discouraged to continue appealing to the Tribunal by the threat of having to pay the full amount if their appeal is not upheld.

Thank you for your invaluable views.

Kind regards,

Almep13

12
Good morning Incandescent,

You deserve the praise too.  :)

As always, thank you for your help.

Have a nice week ahead everyone.

Kind regards,

Almep13

13
Dear All,

I hope you are all well and enjoying the spring weather.

Just to let you know that RBKC council cancelled this PCN.

Thank you for your all your help and valuable views.

Have a nice Sunday.

Kind regards,

Almep13

14
Hi sjcuk7,

There is no need to call them, let them take as long as they wish as it only reinforces your case to dismiss it.

You can check it in their portal if it's still showing as a live PCN.

As and when it goes to Tribunal, if it does, you have plenty to use in your appeal to be successful.

Thanks and regards,

Almep13

15
Good morning,

I just wanted to say that London Tribunals has emailed me this morning saying that LBHF won't contest my appeal with Case Reference: 2250576030 meaning that my PCN has now been cancelled.

Thank you to the forum and its members like Incandescent and H C Andersen for their advices and information offered to support my case.

Thank you and kind regards,

Almep13

Pages: [1] 2 3 4