3. Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - theeagleman

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
The Flame Pit / Re: Using ETA (moving traffic, parking) cases for RUCA (CC, ULEZ etc)
« on: July 10, 2026, 11:39:01 pm »
Quote from: Hippocrates on July 10, 2026, 11:10:41 pm
Quote from: theeagleman on July 10, 2026, 11:07:43 pm
They sent all the paper work via post. Absolute nightmare.

Also 14 days from the date of the decision is up soon, so not sure able to get everything together soon

You have my email address so send it to me.

Thank you so much!
Unfortunately, given the time constraints, the 14 days will pass over the weekend :(

2
The Flame Pit / Re: Using ETA (moving traffic, parking) cases for RUCA (CC, ULEZ etc)
« on: July 10, 2026, 11:07:43 pm »
They sent all the paper work via post. Absolute nightmare.

Also 14 days from the date of the decision is up soon, so not sure able to get everything together soon

3
The Flame Pit / Using ETA (moving traffic, parking) cases for RUCA (CC, ULEZ etc)
« on: July 10, 2026, 09:12:06 pm »
Hi,

Not found any info on this, but wanted to ask for a specific example.

A friend of mine got 3 X PCN for entering CC zone (they are a blue badge holder). They forgot to renew, and that is on them. The 3 X PCNs got appealed individually (albeit late after the 14 day discount, due to travelling abroad).
They received no NOR for either of them (I suspect went to junk mail and never opened).

Anyway, post statutory declaration, and then onto the adjudicator.

Case references such as
- 2140191859
- 2160273606
- 2250108586

Were mentioned in the hearing, but he said they cannot be used for RUCA cases. Funnily, never wrote about such or referenced any of the cases in his writing.

The appeal to adjudicator for the 8 PCNs was that "The penalty exceeded the amount..."

Case Refs:
- 9260317342
- 9260317386
- 9260317331

Any thoughts?

TIA

Advised them to review, but now got to pay £540 within 28 days.

4
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: April 09, 2026, 08:56:47 pm »
Thanks Hippo for the work!

The adjudicator appeared to get out of the wrong side of the bed, and wrongly referenced the dates for the initial threat on the site, on multiple occasions!

5
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Merton - 01 - DYL - Delivery
« on: December 28, 2025, 06:19:55 pm »
Merton has cancelled, without informing it has cancelled it  :)

Cancelled it only last week though

6
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 52M Windmill Drive
« on: November 16, 2025, 06:28:17 pm »
Any update to this?

7
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Merton - 01 - DYL - Delivery
« on: September 30, 2025, 05:18:03 pm »
Quote from: theeagleman on September 28, 2025, 08:45:04 pm

Also wanted to add that on the initial PCN on windscreen they mentioned "outside number 2" - that is inaccurate, as there is no odd door numbers of this road. Not sure if that makes any difference

Is it better to also just wait for the NTO?

I have searched, but could find nothing that relates to being "licensed" for anything PCN related.

8
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Merton - 01 - DYL - Delivery
« on: September 28, 2025, 08:45:04 pm »
Quote from: John U.K. on September 28, 2025, 06:28:07 pm
Quote
Unfortunately, the council would only consider cancelling . . . for licensed delivery drivers

Repeated thrice!!
Is this a new LB Merton-specific by-law??

Persevere.


never heard of "licensed delivery driver" ... I thought having a driving license was enough  :o


Quote from: Incandescent on September 28, 2025, 07:00:49 pm
They are talking complete and utter tosh, (nothing new there, of course). If you were delivering something you are entitle to the loading exemption, but would need to show the need to park on DYLs. This applies to all loading activities, commercial or domestic.


The GSV is here. it was DYL all around and no bays free at the time of the alleged contravention

https://maps.app.goo.gl/rrnFDA6YJk6thxsc9


Also wanted to add that on the initial PCN on windscreen they mentioned "outside number 2" - that is innacurate, as there is no odd door numbers of this road. Not sure if that makes any difference

9
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Merton - 01 - DYL - Delivery
« on: September 28, 2025, 05:58:47 pm »
Hi folks,

The following PCN was given, and proof of delivery supplied, yet they rejected, and appears they did not read the appeal properly at all.

PCN + CEO Evidence (snippet)









Appeal





Evidence Request - Follow Up




Evidence supplied was driving license and initial appeal as as above

Rejection post follow up #1



A bigger picture of the customer order plus arrow pointing to date and time of order and asked what other evidence can be supplied, but they sent the below.

Follow up #2




Any suggestions? Thanks again!





10
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: August 12, 2025, 10:15:38 pm »
Thanks!

and Great film!

11
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: August 12, 2025, 09:49:34 pm »
I really appreciate that!

But I can see you have A LOT ON YOUR PCN PLATE right now, and I do not wish to add more burden  :(

If you are able to guide me, I am happy to do it, and learn along the way  :)

12
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: August 12, 2025, 01:37:05 pm »
Quote from: Hippocrates on August 12, 2025, 09:19:32 am
The usual failure to consider so you know what my advice is.  ;D

Indeed...

I will lodge the initial tribunal appeal.

I guess the main reason is:

The penalty charge exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case

13
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: August 12, 2025, 01:52:31 am »
Sorry for late response

Inital Reps + NoR 1






Inital Reps + NoR 2







Thanks!

14
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: August 05, 2025, 02:46:12 pm »
Lambeth have as expected rejected both appeals - same rejection on both appeals.



on NoR it states 14 days it will go 160, and 28 days it will be 240.

Site states this Friday it will be 240 (The demands on their site as per below)



15
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth - 32j - 2 x PCN - Central Hill
« on: July 11, 2025, 10:35:15 pm »
Quote from: Hippocrates on July 11, 2025, 09:58:10 pm
The issue on which to win is the website.

Is this based on after the initial reps, on their site giving a demand?
or is the current demand a potential technicality?

For PCN 1. Discount option runs out on Sunday, so any draft you can point me to to file, would be grateful.

Vague locus another?

Pages: [1] 2 3