1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: 11X Continuous PCN on a School Street- Richmond Upon Thames,
« on: December 16, 2023, 07:02:17 am »
I am writing this for the beenfit of someone that might have a similar case in the future ! As i won (sort of)
What happened next ? I decided to pay the discounted fare of £65 for the back dated 5 X PCNs as i didnt think i would win those. I made an appeal for the first 6 PCNs to london tribunal on the grounds that i had not recevied the first PCN in the post until commiting 6 PCNs. I calcualted the date of the letter had a 4 day delay from actualling being delivered to my postal address so this allowed me to argue for 6 PCNs. I also admitted that i was at fault for the first PCN but was actually only claiming this at the discounted rate of £65 as Richmond had stated in writing on th rejection letter that they would extend the disocunted rate for 60 days- however the payment system still reflected the de facto £130 fine.
After i submitted the london tribunal case , Richmond updated their payment system to reflect all PCNs at the agreeed extented discount rate of £65 which spooked me and I was very much contemplating to settle them all at £65 and be done with it.
However to my my amasement i received a letter from london tribunal that richmond would not contest my appeal and the first 6 PCN were all cancelled.
That for me feels like a small victory but the learnings here are that
- a possible reason is not receiving the PCN in the post from the date of committing the cotinuous PCNs
- council could have felt that going to london tribunals and punishing someone with 11 PCN would result in negative press and be detrimental.
- It really is a bit of risk taking here as i was prepared that i could lose them all.
Good luck and hope this info helps someone save money
What happened next ? I decided to pay the discounted fare of £65 for the back dated 5 X PCNs as i didnt think i would win those. I made an appeal for the first 6 PCNs to london tribunal on the grounds that i had not recevied the first PCN in the post until commiting 6 PCNs. I calcualted the date of the letter had a 4 day delay from actualling being delivered to my postal address so this allowed me to argue for 6 PCNs. I also admitted that i was at fault for the first PCN but was actually only claiming this at the discounted rate of £65 as Richmond had stated in writing on th rejection letter that they would extend the disocunted rate for 60 days- however the payment system still reflected the de facto £130 fine.
After i submitted the london tribunal case , Richmond updated their payment system to reflect all PCNs at the agreeed extented discount rate of £65 which spooked me and I was very much contemplating to settle them all at £65 and be done with it.
However to my my amasement i received a letter from london tribunal that richmond would not contest my appeal and the first 6 PCN were all cancelled.
That for me feels like a small victory but the learnings here are that
- a possible reason is not receiving the PCN in the post from the date of committing the cotinuous PCNs
- council could have felt that going to london tribunals and punishing someone with 11 PCN would result in negative press and be detrimental.
- It really is a bit of risk taking here as i was prepared that i could lose them all.
Good luck and hope this info helps someone save money
dreading to have to borrow money to pay the £715 or £1430 in full fines fines.