I sent letters to Morris and Newham with the following content! InformationRightsTeam, thank you for your response on October 1, 2025, regarding case IRR-2025-001304...
...
And did you contact Bailiff Advice Online about Rundles? Yes or no?
jhon morris answer. https://ibb.co/6RG5MyP0 https://ibb.co/BKdLJ11m https://ibb.co/HDPvcZkC
https://ibb.co/CKHH2fcH https://ibb.co/XkVmG2H2 I lived there 5 years ago and have already changed 3 addresses. But this does not give the right to send letters to the wrong address for the car, the letter, the fine, and my personal address.The links are for the second Tribunal letter.
I received a response in PDF format. How do I upload it to the forum?
Try sending the email suggested below to InformationRightsTeam@newham.gov.uk and copy john.morris@newham.gov.uk
At the bottom I have put your phone number as 07nnn-nnnnnn. Please correct that to your actual phone number.
And please stick to the issue of the SAR. Please don't add any complaints about signs and so on.
Put "Complaint - Subject Access Request IRR 2025-001304" in the email's subject line".
Post up the acknowledgement emails when you get them.
Getting your information about the PCNs from the Council is one issue. Rundles are a parallel matter. So I still strongly advise you to contact Bailiff Advice Online (https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/) for advice on negotiating a payment plan with Rundles. Phone them.
Sirs,
Re: Subject Access Request IRR 2025-001304
On July 23rd 2025 this SAR was submitted to the council via the online portal provided for this purpose and an acknowledgement email was received, also on the 23rd July.
To date I have not received the council's substantive response nor any explanation for its lateness.
On August 25th I wrote again via email to InformationRightsTeam@newham.gov.uk pointing out that the response to the SAR was now overdue. Again I received an acknowledgement. This acknowledgement advised that a response to my SAR would be sent by the 12 September 2025.
Once again I have not received any response nor any reason for the failure to comply with your own deadline.
I would be grateful if you would look into this as a matter of priority. Please let me have a full response to my SAR within seven calendar days via post and email. Else I will be compelled to consider escalating your failures to the Information Commissioners Office.
For the avoidance of doubt my postal address is:
Viktors Tocinskis
114 Howards Road
London
E13 8AY
and my email contact is;
e4e@inbox.lv
and my phone number is
07nnn-nnnnnn
Yours faithfully,
... Do the documents you provided have your correct and current address? And is that the E13 8AY address? And please confirm that you actually live there?...
... You wrote twice (and a third garbled letter) to the London Tribunals and they sent their responses to an address that is six years out of date, even though that is not the correspondence address you provided.
The Tribunal could only have received that address from the Council...
... Might there be something else going on that you haven't disclosed?...
Re the Tribunal replying to the wrong address. In reply #149 Maks said:
"In the photo of the letter and envelope you can see my address, but in the reply I painted over my old address from 6 years ago"
Now I'm not certain what that means(!), but it would be consistent with the OP inadvertantly supplying an old address to the Tribunal.
If that is so, I wonder if (accidentally) he also supplied the wrong address to Newham when he made his representaions and that is where the NORs have gone(?)
... Do the documents you provided have your correct and current address? And is that the E13 8AY address? And please confirm that you actually live there?...
... You wrote twice (and a third garbled letter) to the London Tribunals and they sent their responses to an address that is six years out of date, even though that is not the correspondence address you provided.
The Tribunal could only have received that address from the Council...
... Might there be something else going on that you haven't disclosed?...
IM postet her https://ibb.co/WpnfKLYZ
If you read the forum, I sent a letter on the advice of forum participants. If you have other advice, please suggest it.
the last answer is from bailiffadviceonline.co.uk
Where?
I can't see anything from bailiffadviceonline(?)
Post Reply#271 above.
(https://i.ibb.co/35gY5yCJ/2025-09-17-160521-ANSWER.jpg) (https://ibb.co/4whgwZVQ)
Thanks. I had doublechecked but I didn't even see the link way over on the right of the post.
So the OP has again misunderstood the advice - in this case to approach bailiffadviceonline - and has asked her about the SAR to Newham rather than asking about how to approach the tickets he hasn't paid? [Edit: Actually I see the advice given twice was very clear - to contact bailiffadvice for suggestions about how to agree a payment plan with Rundles, not to discuss the SAR!]
I did suggest way back on 27 March that as English clearly wasn't the OP's first language (although somebody claimed it was!) and as he obviously didn't have a clue as to how the process worked, he might benefit from a link explaining the process.
(I'd have done it myself but I don't think I'm any more expert than the OP in this)
the last answer is from bailiffadviceonline.co.uk
Where?
I can't see anything from bailiffadviceonline(?)
the last answer is from bailiffadviceonline.co.uk
They've already charged the £235 "attendance" fee, it's included in their ref:22713225. They can only charge the £235 once regardless of how many PCNs they are trying to collect.
If they seize your car then they can charge an additional £110.
I strongly advise you to contact bailiff advice online (https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/). Ask for help with negotiating a staged payment plan with Rundles.
ok I sent it to the main link as in the picture, but maybe I need to choose the right topic?Did you actually send the email I suggested to InformationRightsTeam@newham.gov.uk and copied to john.morris@newham.gov.uk?
I am interested in who turned off this function for me.Read reply #239 again. It's not been switched off for you, it's no longer available for anyone. There's a reason we advise people against uploading directly onto here. The simple reason for limited upload space is money - image hosting requires storage, storage is expensive, and this site is free.
received a response from Information Rights Team Newham DocksidePlease post up the response from the Information Rights Team mentioned above.
They're placeholders for bits you need to fill in, so it looks like this.Have you sent the email above suggested by H C Andersen?Sirs,Email the above to InformationRightsTeam@newham.gov.uk.
Re: Subject Access Request IRR 2025-001304
On July 23rd this SAR was submitted to the council and an acknowledgement received on 23rd July, see the attached screen print.
I must inform you that I have not received the council's substantive response nor any reason for its lateness. I should be grateful if you would look into this as a matter of priority. For the avoidance of doubt my postal address is:
Viktors Tocinskis
114 Howards Road
London
E13 8AY
and my email contact is;
e4e@inbox.lv
Yours faithfully,
Put "Subject Access Request IRR 2025-001304" in the email subject line.
Please check all the details are correct and don't forget to attach the email acknowledgement/screen print.
Please explain the below post. Was this a bailiff clamping your car? How much did you pay out?I have several letters and then by phone! I have already sued these ****, they blocked my car and asked for 200 ... but when I tried to pay online the amount increased to 300. I had to call the **** and agree on 200. I paid 200 but the **** sent letters that if I paid 100 to some **** and 100 to others, then I still owe them!!! The **** offered me a lawsuit by phone, but I replied we will meet in court! The court did not even mention the 100 for the ****, and I won the lawsuit! Now they do not let me go to court!!! Because my car was parked in a parking lot without a single sign!
in this situation I understand that no one personally sent me codes to contact the tribunal, or am I mistaken? if so, then what are the options, I have already sent 3 letters to the tribunal, where I added a photo of my car near 2 solbs without prohibiting signs. I received 2 responses from blind people who probably noticed signs that no one else sees! I sent 2 appeals for theft of the car and 265 pounds, but did not receive a single response, ... what can I do next?In the case of the four PCNs, PN3987672A, PN39795559, PN39833603, PN39781678, it seems that you did not challenge the PCNs with the Council in the form required and within the time limit. Since there were no proper challenges the are no Notices of Rejection and there are no rights to appeal to the Independent Adjudicator, regardless of a verification code or not.
I have several letters and then by phone! I have already sued these ****, they blocked my car and asked for 200 ... but when I tried to pay online the amount increased to 300. I had to call the **** and agree on 200. I paid 200 but the **** sent letters that if I paid 100 to some **** and 100 to others, then I still owe them!!! The **** offered me a lawsuit by phone, but I replied we will meet in court! The court did not even mention the 100 for the ****, and I won the lawsuit! Now they do not let me go to court!!! Because my car was parked in a parking lot without a single sign!
This is a criminal company, bandits!!!I'm sorry to say that Rundles are a legitimate company of Enforcement Agents (Bailiffs). And it's the same company that sent you the Notices of Enforcement for £280 each, that you posted up previously
ok I received a letter from the collectors yesterday, there are some codes there. Maybe through them I can open a case through the tribunal?
6 years ago I lived there. But today I have changed 4 houses and paid for parking at other addresses. Newham has already used this criminal scheme and made me pay 500 pounds. They claimed that they sent letters, but to my old address. But my car was already registered at the new one and parking was paid for. In the end, when I found information about the fine on the photo of my car, there was no ticket. I saw that officer that day, but he did not have time to stick anything on my car and did not tell me anything. And 6 months later these criminals blocked my car and asked for 500 pounds! I think they always do this and I am not the first. So I need to open a case in court where I can prove all the criminal actions of Newham.Who is they? Newham Council?
the tribunal only responded to the email, but I did not receive a single response to my address or the address of my car! the address in the letter again has nothing to do with my address or the address of my car!!! They will all claim that they sent all the responses to my appeals to this address they made up, which is not mine and my car has been registered for 16 months e138ay .
How can you punish these animals for deliberately ignoring answers? How can I start legal proceedings for the remaining 4 fines? After all, they deliberately do not send me the code so as not to give me the opportunity to resolve the problem through the tribunal! I think that they always act like this! I have a lot of problems with Newham! I have not been able to buy a permit for a whole year, they claimed that one car was already registered there and there were no more options! I called them and they offered to buy it for a day for 5 pounds! Now they are offering but double the rate, I don’t know why? Knowing these freaks, I tried to buy it for 1 month, indicated the address, sent confirmation of the address, and received a document on payment. But when I began to study this document, the address I indicated was not indicated there. There was no address at all, only some letters. I studied these letters and it turned out that they took the money for a completely different address, not the one I paid for, and not the one I proved in the documents, on the same day I rejected the order and asked for a refund. The animals replied that they do not return payment for 1 month! Then I asked every day to return the money, because they took the money for a different address, not the one I indicated. And a month later they returned it but stole 5 pounds!!!
They threaten me every day! They write that at 9:00 pm they will come to seize my property!Do you mean standard written documents? Or email or phone messages?
Yes, this address is 6 years old, I haven’t lived there for a long time! My car has had a different address for a long time, I indicated it twice in the letter.
In the photo of the letter and envelope you can see my address, but in the reply I painted over my old address from 6 years ago.So your V5c seems to have the correct name and current address. In which case why would the London Tribunals try to write to you at the old address? I would expect them to respond to the address you put on your Notice of Appeal letter.
I sent a second letter with corrections and received a response. I indicated the address on the envelope and in the letter, but in the response they wrote me a completely different address. I asked them to duplicate the response to my email and only by email I have a response!
I wrote my name and email in the letter .Did you not supply a postal address?
PN39936195 when I picked up my car I asked for an appeal form. I immediately sent them an appeal via tracking, you can see that they received it! I did not receive a response. On your advice I sent another letter, they received a letter .there were no answers!If any response does arrive then please post it up on here.
But I have 4 letters for 4 other fines for this parking lot without prohibiting signs! tell me how to solve this problem through the tribunal?You cannot solve the matter via the tribunal, because the process has passed beyond that to bailiff enforcement. You can only get to the tribunal if you can get the PCN debts that are registered at the Traffic Enforcment Centre cancelled and the process reverted to the PCN stage.
I think @maks might find it very helpful if one of the forum members (all of whom are more knowledgeable than me) posted one of those useful links that actually explains the procedure step by step from receiving a PCN to the end. I'd do it myself if I knew what I was doing regarding PCNs but I don't know what I'm doing.
The OP's first language obviously isn't English and he clearly hasn't a clue as to how all this works. (He reminds me of Captain Haddock ranting in a TinTin cartoon soemtimes)
E69LY this address is indicated in the form itselfI presume you mean the address to where you posted the representation form that you received from the impound yard?
What other information do you need?Do you have a copy of the filled out form?
When I came to pick up the car, I asked for a form to fill out an appeal. At home I filled it out and sent it by mail with tracking, the letter was delivered in 2 days. I didn’t receive any answers!
NEWHAM
(https://www.ftla.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4149.0;attach=13177;image)
who will help fill the last 2 for 205 pounds, what should I do next? how to stop these beasts? how to get to the solutions through trebunal?
I'm already here, I wrote, I immediately took the appeal form and sent it. It was delivered in 2 days, but there are no answers!Once again, when was it delivered? And a copy of what you sent please.
... SEND ME A DOCUMENT TO HAVE THESE FINES REVIEWED IN COURT!
So if you don't submit representations to the council, you cannot register an appeal at LT. how to do this? I tried to make an appeal but they asked me What is your appeal verification code? I only have a web number in my letters, where can I get it verification code?You submit a formal representation to the Council against the Notice to Owner or the PCN for the vehicle removal. If the Council reject then they have to post a Notice of Rejection with instructions on how to appeal to the Adjudicator and a verification code. That's the code the LT are looking forward.
I don't want to talk to them, only in court! Help me start a trial!Except as I said, there is NO COURT and NO TRIALS ! What there is, is London Tribunals, where you can appeal the PCN to an adjudicator. If you win, you pay nothing, if you lose you must pay the PCN penalty.
@NeilB, some details are in the 'Formal Response' attachment to the OP's post at 12.11 yesterday, although its presence is rather drowned out by the shouting capitals!I had looked but I only saw pics.
It's a code 12, but the date and time aren't in evidence so the OP still needs to post these. The o/s amount is £130, but exactly where the OP is with the PCN which relates to the council's evidence, who knows?
THERE IS NOT A SINGLE PROHIBITING SIGN IN THIS PARKING LOT!Please can you comply with what we've asked for.
THERE IS NOT A SINGLE PROHIBITING SIGN IN THIS PARKING LOT!No, and there doesn't need to be either, because it is within a Permit Parking Zone. Obviously you missed these signs when you drove along the street and then parked : -