Author Topic: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long  (Read 3631 times)

0 Members and 281 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #45 on: »
bump

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #46 on: »
@george74 pastmybest has offered to represent you at the tribunal free of charge, so I strongly recommend you take up his kind offer.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #47 on: »
Oh, I received the email and responded a while ago. Let me know if you got it, I can send again if not.

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #48 on: »
If you mean the email to me, then yes i have it. I intend to register the appeal next week so well within the 28 days
Like Like x 2 View List

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #49 on: »
Got the evidence pack though need to contact the tribunal as they have not been responding to me only to the OP

will submit this week and expect a DNC before the hearing
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #50 on: »
This has finally ended in my favour.

I am really grateful to Pastmybest - he attended the tribunal on 15/05/2024.

Reasons:

Quote

The EA contends in its Case Summary that in any event Blue Badge holders are not exempt from the restrictions at the location.
The EA relies, in its Case Summary, on the relevant Traffic Management Order. However, I have not been provided with a copy of this Order. The EA has provided what appears to be part of the Order, namely the map tile upon which it relies. This shows some, but not all of "Heathway" where the vehicle was parked. The map is annotated and purports to show the various restrictions on Heathway. The top section of Heathway is not shown. It is contended on behalf of the Appellant that the vehicle was parked on Heathway, on the northernmost part of the carriageway. This is not shown on the map tile. There appear to be no restrictions on Heathway which reflect the restrictions set out on the signage at the location, namely, parking between Mon-Sat, 8.30pm - 5.30pm, 1 hour, No return within 2 hours. The only annotated reference to such restrictions appear on a road which transects Heathway at the bottom of the page. I cannot make any determination whether this road is also part of Heathway.

I cannot be satisfied therefore that the signage at the location accurately reflects the restrictions at the location as set out in the relevant Traffic Management Order. Nor can I make any determination as to whether Blue Badge parking is or is not prohibited at the location.

I must therefore allow this appeal. Accordingly I do not make any determinations as to the remaining matters set out on the Appellant's behalf.

Many thanks to everyone in this thread and again to Pastmybest.
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Re: Dagenham - Contravention Code 30, parked too long
« Reply #51 on: »
Well done @Pastmybest!
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order