Author Topic: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j  (Read 1524 times)

0 Members and 186 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #30 on: »
This is the appeal process as per this type of contravention: https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat/appeals-process-explained

As per John U.K. contact the tribunal.

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #31 on: »
Have you tried phoning the tribunal?

Yes, just called them after your prompt - thanks. So far, the council haven't submitted any evidence.

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #32 on: »
Have you tried phoning the tribunal?

Yes, just called them after your prompt - thanks. So far, the council haven't submitted any evidence.

Check the portal every day, particularly the end of the working day. Not knowing what you have filed, I would ask for an adjournment as it is less than 7 days before the hearing. If you need help, just ask me.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #33 on: »
@Hippocrates Thanks for the help and your very kind offer - oddly didn't get a notification again and just saw your message today. The Council submitted their evidence on Friday night.

I've attached the evidence they have submitted.
 
I can call them tomorrow to adjourn the hearing if you think it would be advisable to do so. 

Thank you again for all the guidance.



[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #34 on: »
I will PM you. Phone for an adjournment.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2025, 07:54:43 pm by Hippocrates »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #35 on: »
Sent you another one. I am happy to take this one on.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #36 on: »
Edited.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2025, 11:20:07 am by Hippocrates »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #37 on: »
Appeal refused unfortunately. A change of mind. 2250021400.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #38 on: »
I think it is quite disgraceful that adudicators can just change their minds on identical cases in front of them. Frankly, this adjudicator should have passed the decision to another adjudicator if he thought his previous decision was wrong.


Re: Redbridge Council, Clements Road, Contravention of 33j
« Reply #39 on: »
I think it is quite disgraceful that adudicators can just change their minds on identical cases in front of them. Frankly, this adjudicator should have passed the decision to another adjudicator if he thought his previous decision was wrong.

The council’s evidence at J is of very little value..
The terminal sign on the right is obscured by foliage. Under LATOR the council has a duty to maintain such signage so that it is clearly visible to the motorist The video pertaining to PCN AF30090252 shows also a bus coming from the opposite direction so that Mr ***** attention was drawn to that situation.
Regarding the second alleged contravention, it is well established that a motorist does
not deliberately commit the same since s/he is not aware until the first PCN arrives in the post.

I also said that they had not sought a review of his original decision.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"