Free Traffic Legal Advice

Wondering if anyone could help.. I live outside London and had to travel into Croydon to visit grandparents in hospital.. the evening before entered the ulez zones I checked on the tfl website to whether my car is ulez compliant. The tfl website stated I was compliant. I have kept a screenshot stating this. I travelled into Croydon 3/4 times between Oct and December last year. Much to my surprise the owner of the car (a family member) received a fine stating a failure to pay the 12.50 that is charged per day. I appealed the fine using my evidence that the tfl website stated my car is compliant. (I've checked since the fine and it now states the car is now NOT compliant.) I only have 1 fine despite making several journeys into Croydon. I submitted my evidence on the 15th January, checked it this morning to find they've increased the fine to £270 and a charge certificate batched on the PCN history status.. is anyone able to provide advice on steps to continue to fight this? Along with the screenshot stating my car was compliant i stated I travelled in good faith undertaking as much due diligence as I could to ensure I didn't need to pay the daily charge. I have heard nothing from them expect the update (and the letter that will arrive whenever with this increased fine.) Any help is much appreciated!

Thanks.

+1
And can you please read this and update your thread accordingly: -
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/

Can you also, please, clarify the ownership issue, because you refer to "my car", and "the owner of the car(a family memmber)"
Under the decriminalised legislation, the owner of a vehicle retains full responsibility for payment or appealing PCNs. If you submitted reps against the PCN, then they should have been rejected by TfL on the basis you are not the owner. In fact, I believe they are entitled to ignore any representations that don't come from the owner. This is probably the reason the Charge Certificte was served.