Author Topic: ULEZ - after midnight - all letters gone to old address - Stat Declaration form Enforcement visit  (Read 506 times)

0 Members and 71 Guests are viewing this topic.

OP,

This was all done via email - they confirmed receipt of the appeal by email. The address registered to the payment made for the 16 Aug was correct.

How could the appeal have been emailed and yet the sender not have a copy?

Online I could understand, but email? 

You are behind the 8 ball. A SD may only be submitted on one of these grounds:

Statutory Declaration
This is a formal legal declaration and can only be made on the grounds that a person:

did not receive the Penalty Charge Notice in question;
made representations to Transport for London but did not receive a rejection notice from them; or
appealed to a Road User Charging Adjudicator against the rejection by Transport for London of representations made by them but had no response to the appeal.


TfL will claim, correctly, that they obtained the RK's address from DVLA which was used for all subsequent notices.

Somehow your wife is the Road User Account Holder at address B, but you are the registered keeper at address A. She 'appealed' the PCN without telling you and presumably because she's the account holder. IMO ONLY if she made clear in the reply that TfL should use the account holder's address for their response would you definitely succeed with a SD.

If you have nothing to add as regards the email's content, then I don't see how you could convince TEC to reset matters. IMO, you need to introduce this as proof in your SD.

Why not get your wife to contact TfL to obtain a copy ASP? She could submit a Subject Access Request, but this could take some time for TfL to fulfil.

As it stands, it's your neighbours and your car which are in jeopardy. They cannot seize goods in your residence until they've served the mandatory notice.

As it stands, it's your neighbours and your car which are in jeopardy. They cannot seize goods in your residence until they've served the mandatory notice.

Nothing is in jeopardy, OP has paid the fine and is now looking to make his SD.

We have paid bailiffs £590 so I do sincerely hope the new house owners and my car are not in jeopardy anymore.

The appeals process is online so all we have is TFLs receipt of the representation which was emailed to us.

The SD is being submitted on point 2; made representations to Transport for London but did not receive a rejection notice from them.

I think what your saying is unlucky, expensive mistake. Bailiffsonline seemed to think we could submit given the address was marked as unknown twice.

My bad, you have paid. This removes time pressure.


You posted:
THE NEW OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY RETURNED THE CORRESPONDENCE TO SENDER AND
INDICATED I NO LONGER RESIDE THERE ON 18 DECEMBER 2024 AND AGAIN ON 04 JANUARY 2025.

This did not involve the NOR, but refers to other notices the lack of receipt of which is not grounds for a SD.

There are 2 strands to your dilemma:

The penalty: £280(£180*1.5)+£10
The bailiff's fees: £310

The issue of the NoE is central to the latter only and as far as I'm aware there aren't any prescribed means of recovering the £310, it's a matter of direct correspondence with TfL. Bailiffadvice have experience in this area.

As regards the PCN, this was appealed at which point the respondent had the opportunity to notify TfL that address B should be used for all further correspondence. If the respondent did not then IMO not fault attaches to TfL.

IMO, don't submit the OOT until you have the appeal to hand.