Author Topic: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham  (Read 458 times)

0 Members and 47 Guests are viewing this topic.

PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« on: »
I received this PCN yesterday on 22nd October 2025. I drove down on this road whilst my car clock was showing 15:45, on the letter it says 15:44:24. Do I have grounds to appeal on this? If so on what grounds do I say? Thanks.

please see photos of the letter attached on this post.

https://imgpile.com/p/jQFz6sj

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« Reply #1 on: »
Here?
https://maps.app.goo.gl/N6Q95gioHpfsXZtJA

Please post any Council photos.

To issue a PCN over 36 seconds!*!
What a mean, petty decision!!!

I believe you have a good grounds for making reps on de minimis.

See what others say, then post yr draft here for comment before submitting.

Re: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« Reply #2 on: »
Here’s my draft, please let me know is this okay.

The PCN alleges that my vehicle was recorded in contravention at 15:44:24 on 16th October 2025 in Taunton Road junction with Manor Lane. However, the restriction at this location only applies between 14:30 and 15:45. At the time I entered the road, my vehicle’s clock displayed 15:45, indicating that the restriction had just ended.
It is entirely reasonable for a small variation to exist between my car’s clock and the council’s enforcement camera timestamp. A difference of a few seconds either way is within the accepted margin of error and cannot reasonably be relied upon as evidence that a contravention occurred.
My vehicle entered the road at or after 15:45, no contravention took place, as the restriction had ceased at that time. I therefore respectfully request that you review the CCTV footage and confirm whether the camera clock was correctly calibrated and synchronised with an official time source on the date in question.
Given the minimal and arguable difference in timing, and the principle of de minimis non curat lex (the law does not concern itself with trifles), I ask that this PCN be cancelled.

Re: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« Reply #3 on: »
Please get and post the video. Whilst your argument re the time is valid and there are cases that have won on that it is better if we can find an issue with the visibility of the signage or other evidential inadequacy

Re: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« Reply #4 on: »
Here’s the video evidence

https://imgpile.com/p/4eQzmi7

Re: PCN contravention 53J Taunton Road/Manor Lane Lewisham
« Reply #5 on: »
The timing is within what adjudicators will often allow.

I take it you were aware of the restriction and checked your clock?

Representation should be on de minimis - there's no point in asking them about their clock accuracy as adjudicators don't expect car clocks to be synced with CCTV.