3. Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie  (Read 618 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« on: »
Dear all  :)

got this PCN from redbridge while i was struck behind a stopped vehicle and kindly see the image and advice if i could appeal on the basis of van blocking the barriers.

Contravention date: Saturday, 12 Oct 2024 13:41

Contravention: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specified side of the sign

Street: OVERTON DRIVE; WANSTEAD
Location:

Status: Penalty Charge Notice Posted







Thank you for your time and looking into this.

KR
« Last Edit: October 19, 2024, 10:00:37 am by chopwell20 »
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #1 on: »
Well, how would you have seen the blue arrow sign with the van blocking the way ? The contravention did not occur, but you'll inevitably have to take them to London Tribunals for a decision your way.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #2 on: »
Please to post all sides of the PCN. redacting only yr name & address.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #3 on: »
Agree with Incandescent. On your approach you wouldn't be able to see the blue arrow. And most likely not the width restriction either.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #4 on: »
Quote from: Incandescent on October 19, 2024, 10:06:02 am
Well, how would you have seen the blue arrow sign with the van blocking the way ? The contravention did not occur, but you'll inevitably have to take them to London Tribunals for a decision your way.

Thank You.
Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #5 on: »
Quote from: MrChips on October 19, 2024, 10:18:39 am
Agree with Incandescent. On your approach you wouldn't be able to see the blue arrow. And most likely not the width restriction either.

Thank you.
Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #6 on: »
Quote from: John U.K. on October 19, 2024, 10:07:53 am
Please to post all sides of the PCN. redacting only yr name & address.

Thank you and posting it in a min
Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #7 on: »
Quote from: John U.K. on October 19, 2024, 10:07:53 am
Please to post all sides of the PCN. redacting only yr name & address.



Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #8 on: »
The video shows that you were never 'struck behind a stopped vehicle ' but that you approached the width restriction at speed and on the wrong side of the road. Do you have evidence which counters what the video shows?
Logged
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #9 on: »
I think you'll be paying this. Looks like you overtook a queue while the van driver was wondering what to do (and seems to have also opted to take the PCN).

Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #10 on: »
Quote from: H C Andersen on October 19, 2024, 04:39:12 pm
The video shows that you were never 'struck behind a stopped vehicle' but that you approached the width restriction at speed and on the wrong side of the road. Do you have evidence which counters what the video shows?
I agree completely with HCA. I don't think the OPs argument will stand any scrutiny and an adjudicator will see what I see on the video. An impatient driver.
The OP approached the scene on the wrong side of the road after passing one or more stationary car/s behind the van and also passed a previous traffic island again on the wrong side of the road

edit... stamf beat me to it
« Last Edit: October 19, 2024, 05:44:10 pm by mickR »
Logged
Quote from: andy_foster
Mick, you are a very, very bad man
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #11 on: »
Just goes to show that until one sees the video, one can only rely on the OPs version of events. It's only right at the end of the video, when the van moves off, that one see the queue of traffic behind it which the OP passed at speed.
Yes, a definite lose at London Tribunals unless the OP can tell us more.
Logged
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #12 on: »
Quote from: H C Andersen on October 19, 2024, 04:39:12 pm
The video shows that you were never 'struck behind a stopped vehicle ' but that you approached the width restriction at speed and on the wrong side of the road. Do you have evidence which counters what the video shows?
Thank You.
Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #13 on: »
Quote from: stamfordman on October 19, 2024, 04:58:08 pm
I think you'll be paying this. Looks like you overtook a queue while the van driver was wondering what to do (and seems to have also opted to take the PCN).



Thanks
Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #14 on: »
Quote from: mickR on October 19, 2024, 05:08:58 pm
Quote from: H C Andersen on October 19, 2024, 04:39:12 pm
The video shows that you were never 'struck behind a stopped vehicle' but that you approached the width restriction at speed and on the wrong side of the road. Do you have evidence which counters what the video shows?
I agree completely with HCA. I don't think the OPs argument will stand any scrutiny and an adjudicator will see what I see on the video. An impatient driver.
The OP approached the scene on the wrong side of the road after passing one or more stationary car/s behind the van and also passed a previous traffic island again on the wrong side of the road

edit... stamf beat me to it
Thank you
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
  3. Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie