@mdar50743 sorry for the delay, it's a busy period at the moment.
Dear London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham,
I challenge liability for this PCN on the basis that the alleged contravention did not occur, this is because The Hammersmith and Fulham (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (Consolidation) Order 2020 does not create any parking zones. I refer you to the decisions in Josephine Dayan v London Borough of Barnet at LINK1, Philip Cohen v London Borough of Barnet at LINK2 and Alessandro Di Lieto v London Borough of Croydon at LINK3.
In light of the above the penalty charge notice must be cancelled.
Yours faithfully,
I will PM you the links to put in the representation, they will redirect to the decisions but if you give them the links I'll PM you, we can use the click count to confirm whether they've looked at them or not (obviously do not click on the links I PM you as we want the click count to remain at zero). If they don't click on them, we can then prove they've failed to consider all of the evidence. If they say in the rejection that they've considered all the evidence, we've got them for lying as well.
