Free Traffic Legal Advice

Whilst Page 1 of the PCN lists the correct regulations for the PCN, the page for representations is seriously misleading as it lists the old ACTand the old regulations, and in addition, does not contain the full list of statutory grounds for a representation.
This, for me, is a serious error and grounds for cancellation of the PCN. I would take this all the way to adjudication of the grounds of procedural impropriety. This is one of the statutory grounds omitted by the council on their PCNs. Councils must obey the law just like they expect motorists to.

Is there any link for the statutory grounds that you can please guide me for reference ?

Here: -
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2022/9780348232752/contents
Regulation 5

Thank you so much for your advice @cp8759.

@azuremumbai80 no, they're supposed to know the law that they purport to enforce.

Hi team,
Thanks for your support . I got  a rejection for my representation and have been asked to reach out to the Tribunal .
Should I take the same argument to the Tribunal now.Pleas e guide..
Letter as attached and link

https://1drv.ms/b/c/8af311400893ecfb/EVzL2SRp_hlJikscbtn1wqABRjtBnjkFj9Iih7h_XPMHZA?e=XBt9Ef

If it were me, I'd be taking them to the tribunal. Councils must obey the law same as you.

Hi All,
Hope you are well.

Following my appeal , I have been asked to go for a Telephone  or Video or Adjudicator hearing.

Any recommendation which one should I take first..
The default if unanswered in 7 days goes to adjudicator. 

Thanks..

Please find the Authority Summary for the Appeal-

Authority Summary:   The Penalty Charge Notice has been issued correctly and in line with current legislation.  The document contains grounds for representation.  Documents were updated when the new legislation came into force.

Mrs Divya Shetty vehicle has been observed on CCTV driving through Penzance Drive Bus gate.  There are clear signs in the area including a sign at the pedestrian crossing alerting road users of the upcoming bus gate, as well as a sign on the traffic lights showing no left turn accept for buses, taxi’s and cycles.

We do not believe that there has been any procedural error and the Penalty Charge Notice has been issued correctly.






My Appeal statement :-



Grounds of Appeal:   
The authority made a procedural error

I think I have compelling reasons

Explanation:   
Whilst Page 1 of the PCN lists the correct regulations for the PCN for my car Lg23WKT, the page for representations is seriously misleading as it lists the old ACT and the old regulations, and in addition, does not contain the full list of statutory grounds for a representation.  This is a serious error and grounds for cancellation of the PCN. I would like to raise this with Traffic Penalty tribunal on the grounds of procedural impropriety.  This is one of the statutory grounds omitted by the council on their PCNs. Councils must obey the law just like they expect motorists to.

Morning All,
 Any useful guidance for the hearing that I could apply for the procedural shortcomings.