Free Traffic Legal Advice

What are the PCN number and car VRM. You've blanked them.

The PCN is invalid. Second sentence under the picture - they cannot serve a charge certificate 28 days from the date of the notice, only from the date of service.

Dear Southwark

I make this collateral challenge.

The statement under the picture on the PCN “If full payment has not been made before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of this notice, a Charge Certificate may be issued increasing the amount outstanding by 50% to
£195.00” is incorrect. Schedule I @ paras. 5(1) and (2)(a) states from the date of service.  In light of this, the PCN is invalid. Please cancel.

***

Signage:  do your stuff here and post up for checking.

***

FYI:  https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/schedule/1/enacted

Task for you: please screenshot their website page re payment status as if to challenge now and save it.

Video shows no sign and the sign(s) - are they set back from the road entrance which means you may already be committed to the turn. Worth checking the tribunal site for allowed cases.

and looking around, the video appears to show you leaving the school zone which is Ivydale Road and turning into Lansbury Road?

No, the OP turns left into Lanbury Road. If you look at the video , you'll see this high brick wall and lower wooden fence of the garden on the corner, and note also the street name on this wall and the small window : -
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Q1Yzt6VcoFExSQX77

So with the OP turning left this is what he would have seen on approach: -
https://maps.app.goo.gl/MKSGfrTbwaor8AVu8

One of the signs is vitually invisible as it is side-on, and the other one seems to apply directly to the road ahead. As the OP says, that is why he turned left thinking the sign he saw applied to the rest of Ivydale Road.  Essentially the council is sighting these signs so stupidly, have created a trap. The OP saw the sign and acted upon it !! I am quite sure others do the same, especially those new to the area.

Switch the reasons round make the not contravention the first and the faulty document second

Southwark sent an email response, with NoJ. It seems they failed to address the point raised re: Schedule 1 para 5(1) and 2(a).

https://postimg.cc/gallery/5dRC7K42

You have lodged an appeal?