Author Topic: PCN received from council for parked with one or more wheels on or over a footpath (642)  (Read 1094 times)

0 Members and 102 Guests are viewing this topic.

Image 2

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 3

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 4

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 5

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 6

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 7

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 8

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 9

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Image 10

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

The DYL are clear as are 24/7 no loading markings;
The kerbstones are the same before and after i.e. it's not a footway lowered to meet the carriageway.

What indicators are there that this is part of the carriageway?


OP, remember that as you were parked you were also in contravention of the DYL and no loading restriction...as were the other vehicles in your photos. But the CEO chose 'parking in a road other than on a carriageway'.

But you're free to challenge at this stage, thence the registered keeper ultimately to adjudication.





I'm confused now.. so I've got no case but I should take it all the way??

I'm just setting out the process.

By all means submit a challenge along the lines of your first post. Personally, on the basis of the known facts conveyed by the on-site indicators I think the contravention is proved.

The authority might mess up procedurally, but this is a risk you(and the registered keeper if not you) takes going forward.

If you use your first post you might need to expand on why your child was dropped off at 11.40.

It seems to me that the TRO needs to be examined to see what it says about this road. Could it be that it has been left unchanged and the old layout is what is in the TRO ?

What is a TRO

What is a TRO
Traffic Regulation Order. All signs must reflect what the TRO says. This includes yellow lines as well as signs.