Author Topic: PCN Royal Borough of Greenwich 52M Contravention Langton Way  (Read 530 times)

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

PCN Royal Borough of Greenwich 52M Contravention Langton Way
« on: »
Advice please.
PCN from driving in LTN zone Langton Way/Dover Road SE3. 
06/10 contravention, date of notice 23/10

I am at fault and did not see the poor signage at the junction.

My biggest issue is that I know I have done the same journey at least another 3 times between then and now, so I will have huge bills racking up.  Any advice on how to contest this at all?

On researching this junction, others have said "This entry to the LTN is particularly poorly positioned in my view. There is no advance warning and the sign and camera are immediately on the junction turning into Langton Way. As the junction is a roundabout, doing a U turn is almost impossible even if a driver sees the sign."

DROPBOX photos here:

Does anyone have any advice on appealing against having to pay this fine multiple times?

Many thanks in advance.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: PCN Royal Borough of Greenwich 52M Contravention Langton Way
« Reply #1 on: »
Please have a read of

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/

and post up here (use
ibb.co or https://imgpile.com/
for posting images.
Wherever possible, use the BBCode.)

all sides of the PCN you do have (only redact yr name & address - leave all else in),
A GSV link to the location,
and any council photos/video.

You could also check with the council for any PCNs outstanding against yr Reg.Mark.

Re: PCN Royal Borough of Greenwich 52M Contravention Langton Way
« Reply #2 on: »
Quote
I am at fault and did not see the poor signage at the junction

You're not at fault at all if the signage is poor !!  Poor signage = inadequate signage and 'adequacy' is a key requirement within Regulation 18 of The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/2489/regulation/18

However, if you are to win on inadequate signage, you must describe why the signage is inadquate in order to get the council to try to prove its adequacy. They will probably supply a load of guff. Do be aware that whatever representations you submit to the council, they will reject them, no matter how valid they are. They do this because they know that most people (>95%) then cough-up, the council having cunningly re-offering the discount.

I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"