Sadly, as the files are too big it wouldn't let me attach all.
It does if you actually read the instruction here:
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/ (but you have to actually read it properly, skimming over it and then not following the instructions doesn't count).
Here are the council photos:
If you'd parked parallel to the road against the bank of earth, you would have been OK. Unfortunately however your car is parked adjacent to a kerb that has quite clearly been lowered to make it easier for pedestrians to cross the carriageway.
One possible argument that could be made is that the area where you were parked is a vehicle crossover, such that the footpath is not interrupted at all so the lowered keeb cannot be there for the purpose of allowing pedestrians to cross the carriageway at all, but that is only just about arguable and I don't think it would succeed at the tribunal.
In the circumstances there are only two possible strategies:
1) Make a plea for discretion, or
2) Try and trip the council up into failing to consider your representations.
Strategy 1 involves appealing to the authority's discretionary power not to enforce, which is a power only the council has (the tribunal cannot allow an appeal on this basis).
Strategy 2 involves giving the council a link to a video or image you want them to consider, and setting it up view a click / view counter so we can prove whether they're looked at your supporting evidence. If they fail to look at it, you can then win on a failure to consider.
The best approach might be to combine both approaches (provide evidence of mitigation by means of a link), but first we need to know if you have any meaningful mitigation to put forwards.